WARNING: This post contains reference to male bovine excrement and a barely disguised F bomb.
How can parents be assured that their children are safe on
the school playground? They can’t, is the short answer. The potential hazards
to an active child’s physical and/or psychological health are many, and so
there can hardly be a “safe playground,” although there can be “safer
playgrounds,” certainly.
The way
we normally deal with hazards is by reacting after an event in which injury or
an obvious near miss presents. A man solicits a child on a playground and we build
a chain link fence around it. Another child falls off the ladder on a slide and
breaks an arm, so we order newer, safer slides. A playground is too small to
accommodate all the classes without fights and bullying breaking out, so we
stagger recess times and search out parent volunteers to boost supervision. All
adults with access to children have to have criminal record checks, all must
mask during epidemics, misbehaviour is punished and yet, if a child is to be
protected 100% from all the dangers parents can imagine, what strategy short
of keeping them at home, in bed, 24/7 is there?
Mind
you, there are helicopter parents who look out for their kids to the point
where they themselves become hazardous to the child’s self-reliance-skills development, and there are others whose childcare amounts to little more than counting
the children at bedtime to make sure no one is missing. When it comes to risk
tolerance vs. intolerance, we’re all over the landscape so that a level of
safety precautions assumed to be necessary by one parent is a ludicrous over-reaction
to another.
Our world
is a playground; COVID-19 variations pose a hazard to everyone’s health; like a
school administration seeks to protect children from exploitation, our
governments are charged by us with doing what’s possible to protect us from
illness or death at the hands of a virus sneaking around in our playground. Most
of us will acquiesce to restrictions and precautions if they make sense to us;
our wish to stay healthy and alive is a great motivator. But there will always
be those who balk at safety measures, who will reconstruct the situation in
their own minds to justify non-cooperation in vaccinations, mask wearing,
limiting gatherings, etc. They will always be right in declaring that communities’
safety measures don’t make the playground safe anyway, and will justify
non-cooperation that way. That will always be true, because lechers can find a
way around a chain link fence, bullies can hide their nefarious acts from
teachers, any child at any time can slip and fall.
Point
is, if a completely safe playground is impossible, is a safer playground
worth the effort? Must a vaccine protect
100% or be thrown out? If after installing better slides in the playground, a
child still falls off the ladder and breaks a limb, is that proof that replacing
the slides was a bullshit idea? And if a church insists that you wear a mask as
a precaution against spreading COVID if you wish to participate in a service,
does that contribute to safety, and does it rob anyone of a fundamental
freedom?
Children
on a playground are not equally at risk. Some are amazingly attractive and
therefor walk around with unearned cachet, while others feel homely as picket
fences by comparison. Some are learning-gifted while others have a hard time
with concepts. Some run really fast; others invariably come last. When we try
to make playgrounds safer, do we have the gifted in mind, or the vulnerable? And
when as a nation we enact measures to make the environment as health-safe as
possible in time of pandemic, are we thinking about the robust population or
the vulnerable minority? Or do we play one against the other?
How we
think about the right way to react to critical needs in a population that’s as
various as ours turns out to be the big challenge. A man once said to me, “Why
are they charging me a school tax when I no longer have any kids in school?” He
didn’t say, “I happily pay the school tax because my community believes that
every child benefits from a good education, and then we all benefit.” The
balance between thinking of myself and mine as independent of my neighbours or
nation, and visualizing emerging events as community challenges to which I owe
a contribution, that’s really the only important question here …
… unless,
of course, I don’t—as they say—give a flying f**k unless it’s my kid
that falls off the slide. When that level of selfishness becomes the norm, democracy
and the communal spirit will be well on their way to extinction. A playground where a few teachers and a bunch of kids have formed a gang bent on undermining the principal's playground protocols ... well, you can finish this sentence.
Preach brother . You're a good playground supervisor.
ReplyDelete