Made in Rosthern, ca 1907 |
I took a History of English course at
the University of Alberta long, long ago. The prof was a linguist and
the approach was consistent with evolutionary thinking. Anyone in the
class who rejected biological evolution would still come away
from that class believing in linguistic evolution. It became
so darned obvious under the tutelage of someone like Dr.
Cantrememberhisname.
There’s a program on the Discovery
channel that I like to watch: How it’s Made,
it’s called, and it follows the manufacturing processes of everyday
objects beginning with raw materials and ending with, say, a hammer
or a snowmobile. We can probably be forgiven for seeing a hammer that
“just is” without paying attention to it’s origins; you just
can’t know everything! But in that class at the U of A where we
looked at our English language with the intensity of How
it’s Made, I gained an
appreciation for the fluidity of language, the way it begins and the
ways in which it changes, usually in concert with changes in other
aspects of our cultures: our ecology, our economics, our migrations.
(A
tidbit: vulgar
meant the common people
early on in it’s life.
It’s equivalent in understanding today might be “the middle
class.” From it’s Latin base to the present, it’s evolved to be
used to describe low, mean, highly objectionable persons and actions.
How it went from its reference to the peasant class to its use in
describing despicable persons and events would in itself make for an
interesting cultural study. ((An aside to the tidbit: the Vulgate
Bible was not a translation for rude, mean people; it was a
translation for common use.)))
Historically,
people didn’t have the benefit of scholarship like that of Dr.
Cantrememberhisname, or of TV programs to explain How it’s
Made. But some were
understandably curious about how it was that when some people spoke,
they couldn’t understand them, and when they themselves spoke,
others heard gibberish. At some time, the myth of the confounding of
language at the Babel Tower was given birth, a myth that gospel
writers reversed in the de-confounding at Pentecost. Taken together,
they illustrate that what went wrong is being
made right with the coming of Christ and the upside-down nature of
his teaching.
Understanding
the story of languages—the How it’s Made
of our mother tongues particularly—is far more important than
knowing how the handle of a hammer is given its shape. In the case of
the hammer, it doesn’t really matter if we imagine it to have
arrived intact in its present form; lack of facility in and knowledge
of the nuances in language starts wars, ends marriages, breaks
communities up into parcels of misunderstanding.
We
taught language facility in an earlier age—rhetoric and oratory,
debating, grammar and penmanship—as the
important subjects in school. Students were required to master basics
of Latin (from which much of English vocabulary and grammar derive)
and possibly some Greek as well. We deemed it important that people
learn to express their thoughts well and that they comprehend the
thoughts of others, well expressed. We understood how important it is
to be able to write legibly, clearly and precisely; how important it
is to be able to read and comprehend clear and precise writing; how
crucial an adequate and growing vocabulary can be to all human
interaction.
We
once understood that language knowledge and facility are key to
pretty much everything.
(A
recent bit of satire chastised Barack Obama for deliberately
humiliating President Trump by speaking in complete sentences with an
actual verb in each.)
Pointing-and-grunting
might be language enough when we’re digging a ditch, but the
demands of the times cry out for language more fluent, more precise,
more poetic than that.
No comments:
Post a Comment