The other-worldly structure housing the
Canadian Human Rights Museum in Winnipeg is reason enough to spend
time there. Walking up from level to level on the “ramps” allows
you to appreciate the enormous open space, suggestive to me of the
global significance of all of us on earth being interdependently
inhabitants of the same space, in space . . . this fragile earth. The
panorama of Winnipeg city from the Eighth floor encourages visitors
to think about their (our) place in the human story; the cities,
towns, villages in which we all live are where we are rooted, where
the human rights to food, shelter and safety are extended to us . . .
or not.
I've had people tell me that they don't
like talking about our relationships to one another in terms of
rights, that rights
smacks of selfishness, of a me-centered world view. My counter to
this has always been that demanded rights might
well have that feel, but that in a world where two thirds are in need
and one third are in surplus, it's probably a good way to measure
what goods, services and living space would be necessary before we
could say that fairness had crowded out inequity. If quality acute
health care is expected in Rosthern, does it follow that persons in
rural Zambia ought to enjoy a similar level of care? If I can drink
from a tap in my kitchen without having to haul or boil the water,
and if I have a right to complain when that's not the case, do
persons in rural Sierra Leone have the same right to complain?
The museum traces
the development of cultural/social rights that are often taken for
granted. Women's suffrage, freedom from discrimination in the
workplace, access to education, etc. are all covered briefly in
booths that must become almost inaccessible on busier days than the
one on which we visited. Much of what is displayed can't be
appreciated without attending to audio-visual displays that have a
beginning and an ending, and being able to do that requires that
visitors take time to sit and wait, observe and contemplate.
The museum must be
treated as a series of experiences, not as a window shopping for neat
information. Time must be taken; repeat visits are necessary; there
is simply too much to be absorbed in one four-hour visit.
There are critics
of course. It's something very new: I can't find anything in my
experience with which to compare the architect's vision, for
instance. The subject of human rights doesn't immediately spring to
mind as a topic for a museum. It's not a big surprise to hear the
words “ugly” and “magnificent” in the same dialogue about the
place. When the engineers and the builders first examined the
architectural drawings, they must certainly have scratched their
heads: it's that revolutionary.
And some have
complained that their cultural history is not given adequate
attention. You'd expect this given Canada's multi-cultural
composition. Even a space this size has limits, as does human
imagination.
I've always
appreciated the concept of human rights as a starting point
for protecting and enhancing the health, freedom and dignity of all
people and so have donated considerable time and money to Amnesty
International, an organization working from the premise that
humans are born with inalienable rights. The UN Universal
Declaration on Human Rights passed in 1948 lays out the
fundamentals of inalienable human rights and equivalent documents
exist in the constitution of many states. The Canadian Charter
of Rights and Freedoms became the law of the land in 1982,
broadening the scope and jurisdiction of the 1960 Bill of Rights.
Bills of Rights probably owe their beginnings and content to a
considerable degree to the development of the Magna
Carta, begun in 1215 and amended in subsequent years.
Rights of the
individuals and communities of the world can be written on paper, but
they remain words only until accepted, adopted, incorporated into the
fabric of national and international relations. The problem of
enforcement looms large; the UN can lodge a complaint against Canada
for its human rights record in relation to its aboriginal population,
but causing the Canadian government to act on that complaint is
another thing. In other countries, the provisions of even the basics
in the Universal Declaration on Human Rights are simply ignored. Economic and political interests have been known time and
again to render individual rights dispensable when doing so advances
their hold on power.
But the struggle
goes on and on one floor of the Human Rights Museum, visitors are
encouraged to write and post notes based on their hopes and dreams
for a future where all humans can feel the freedom and dignity that
we enjoy daily.
Do visit it when you can, and do set aside enough time to absorb its message.
No comments:
Post a Comment