Reading it ain't easy! |
Gerald Gerbrandt, former president of
CMU (Canadian Mennonite University), gave his first talk on “Hearing
the God of Scripture” last night at the Rosthern Mennonite Church. The first session encouraged us to
think of the scriptures that have been passed down to us as “story,
art and drama.”
Three more sessions are planned.
I had lunch with a friend
newly-returned from a week in Israel the other day, and in the course
of our chatter he asked me what I considered to be the solution to
the impasse in Palestine and might it come through the
Christianization of the people there, which would make our role more missional than diplomatic. I said I didn't have anything to
offer as a solution; for one, I've never been there, never had the
opportunity to “feel” what it's like to be Israeli or Palestinian
in that small part of the world in 2014.
What's becoming clearer to me is that
Christians are no more “of one accord” than anyone else on the
subject of bringing peace to the Middle East. In part, their
ambivalence is tied to the way in which scriptures and the historical
records are read. We may be looking through the same windows, but
interpreting what we see has a host of antecedents.
Harper really did us all an injustice
when he brought the word antisemitism
into the dialogue on his recent visit there. There are probably
numerous people for whom a hatred of Jewry figures in criticisms of
Israel's behaviour, but to link such criticism—for instance of the
establishment of West Bank settlements—to antisemitism
tends to stifle dialogue and generosity of spirit in the ongoing
efforts to broker a lasting and just peace.
There
are other trigger-words
about. For instance, who could blame a casual reader of scripture for linking the
Israel of the Old
Testament with the name of the present state of Israel, and
present-day Jerusalem with the New Jerusalem in the book of
Revelation? (“I saw the Holy City, the new
Jerusalem, coming down
out of heaven from God, prepared as a bride beautifully dressed for
her husband.” -Revelation 21:2) For many a scripture-reader,
dividing the modern-day, secular, political democracy that is Israel
from the Biblical chronicles doesn't come easily.
Gerbrandt
urged us to think of scripture more as artful story than as rule
book. Many of the laws in the book of Leviticus, for instance, have
long since been rendered obsolete by the passage of time and new
experiences. Meanwhile, there is clearly an over-arching “story”
in scripture, an establishment of basic principles that include, at
least, justice, empathy and compassion as the birthright of every
living creature. Neither Israel's treatment of Palestinians nor the
Canadian treatment of Aboriginal citizens historically can pass the
smell test when the principles
in the scriptural story are applied: both fail on justice, empathy
and compassion standards even when the behaviours in question can be
rationalized legally.
That's
not being antisemitic; that's
being human and, hopefully, in synch with the appeals of the whole
scriptural story.
Gerbrandt's
seminars are timely—and much needed.
Thanks for this, George. We have just read "My Promised Land" which treats of present day Israel, and we are now reading "Buffalo Shout: Salmon Cry," another wonderful book which treats of settler society/indigenous society experiences. We don't need cliches; we need justice, empathy, humility, and humanity.
ReplyDeleteWhen is Gerbrandt speaking again?
Hugh,
ReplyDeleteHe spoke this morning on the big story in the Old Testament. Tonight at 7:30 he'll focus on the gospels. He'll also be involved in the Adult Sunday School at RMC tomorrow as well as giving the sermon.