Erst muss Ordnung sein
Speaking of Bark . . .
I’m sure that the set of motive/opportunity circumstances for pretty much
every crime is unique, so it’s somewhat foolish to talk about crime as if it
were one thing. In Fyodor Dostoevsky’s Crime
and Punishment, Raskalnikov—a student who has had to quit lessons because
he has no money—lives in a garret and while feverishly ill, is tortured by the
injustice of his situation and resentful of the old woman who holds all his
former valuables in pawn. In this condition, he first dreams about and then
premeditates her brutal murder and robbery, which he then carries out
methodically.
Except
for one thing. The old woman’s daughter walks in on his crime and he sees no
way out but to crack open her skull with his axe. So confused, guilty and
agitated is he by this time that he botches the robbery in his attempt to flee
and ends up with little except his guilt to take home with him.
That,
in short, is the anatomy of one crime, albeit fictitious.
I see
no authentic way to equate Raskalnikov’s crime to those of Clifford Olsen,
Robert Pickton . . . or Osama Bin
Laden, for that matter, except that all four knew that the consequences for
their crimes—if apprehended—would be enormous. None of the above, it seems,
were deterred either by the prospect of a life of remorse and guilt or the
possibility that they might well be executed or imprisoned-for-life for what they
had done.
Slowly
but surely, Canada is allowing the Harper government to pull us back to medieval
concepts of crime and punishment, namely, if thirty lashes won’t deter
criminals from committing crimes, then let’s see how they like sixty lashes! I
can only assume that both Stephen Harper and Vic Toews are aware that the crime
bill they’re championing will be both futile and expensive. The obvious
conclusion is that they have also discovered that 39% of the population is
enough to win a majority and that with law and order, jet fighter and
economy-before-environment policies, they can be assured of 39% of the vote, no
problem.
If
there is a key to solving problems of crime, terrorism and environmental
degradation, it is surely in the area of prevention, not retribution.
Mind
you, prevention wouldn’t be cheap either. For instance, we know that a combination of poverty-amidst-wealth alongside exclusion breeds high crime rates,
relatively speaking. Raskalnikov’s crime was hatched in the futility of poverty
without prospects. Bullying in schools is symptomatic of the competitive and
exploitative, them-and-us environment in
which our children are raised. Tackling realities like those makes building
pipelines to Texas child’s play. It won’t be cheap.
An imaginative approach to poverty
in Canada is way overdue; it’s time to take down the “Stop Bullying” placards
and put up the “Prevent Bullying” signs; it’s time for a serious, communal
rethinking of our child rearing, community institution and educational objectives.
Every
crime involves a unique set of circumstances and it’s likely that degenerates like
Olsen and Pickton will appear again, a new, sterner crime bill or better preventative programs notwithstanding. But heaven help us if we don’t even give
prevention a good try.
It’s time for informed, sincere leadership.
I’m guessing that 100% of the population could rally behind it.
No comments:
Post a Comment