West Brook, Gros Morne National Park
On the set of Random Passage
What struck me most forcefully in reading paleoecologist Curt
Stager’s Deep Future: The Next 100,000
Years of Life on Earth was his emphasis on our skewed perceptions of time. My
example of what he’s talking about is this: if continental drift occurs at an
average speed of one centimetre per year, then the final separation of
Newfoundland from Labrador took place approximately three million years ago,
assuming that the ferry crossing over the Strait of Belle Isle is 30 kilometres
at present . . . and increasing by one centimetre per year. (For those of you
who don’t think metric very often, a centimetre is the approximate width of a
fingernail.)
It’s
little wonder that we can’t feel the earth move beneath us as it does in our
imaginations, except when the continental plates grind against each other and
earthquakes result.
Stager's examples relate to the effect of human-activity-driven global warming on, for
instance, the inundation of low-lying areas of earth. Florida will gradually
disappear, but it will be so slow that people will not have to rush to higher
ground. There will be plenty of time—possibly a few centuries—for the
population to adapt to the slowly rising waters. The burning question becomes: “If
it’s that far away, does it really matter?”
And,
as Hamlet says, “there’s the rub.” Our lives are such a short blip in the story
of human life on earth and so fragile that we seldom sense our kinship with
people who lived through the last ice age and the people thousands of years
from now who will live on an earth shaped—in part—by our activities. “Sufficient
unto the day is the evil thereof (Matthew 6:34).” Stager would likely wish that
Jesus would take this almost-epicurean aphorism back. When we talk about
conservation these days, we hope for a good life for us, our children and
grandchildren, and that’s about as far as we seem able or willing to think.
Three
things I can think of this morning prevent us from being responsible parents to
future humanity:
1) Our
Politics: those who govern us have trouble thinking beyond the next election.
There is little personal reward for a politician who advocates conservation now
in the interest of the deep future.
2) Our
religions: a consciousness that assumes the end of everything is near is not
likely to concern itself very much with a deep future.
3) Our
ignorance: we need to understand our lives in a bigger context than at present—both
in time and space. Reading Stager’s Deep
Future: The Next 100,000 Years of Life on Earth, Jeff Rubin’s Why Your World is about to get a Whole Lot
Smaller or The Grand Design by
Stephen Hawking and Leonard Mlodinow have helped me gain new perspectives
recently.
There may be an even bigger impediment to the awakening
of a new vision for the human race, something to do with an overarching
awareness of our kinship and an end to racial, ethnic and class differences
that hamstring the chances for joint endeavour.
Therein
lies another “rub.” And it's a big one.
No comments:
Post a Comment