![]() |
Borrowed from free, internet images; definitely AI generated |
“The hand that signed the paper
felled a city ...”
This opening line of Welsh
poet Dylan Thomas’ lament about war should be a wake-up call today. Written in
1938, the poem preceded World War II, but Thomas would live to see the most horrifying
truth in his poem manifest when in 1945, President Harry Truman “signed the
paper” that “felled” Hiroshima and Nagasaki, killing somewhere between 200,000
and 300,000 civilians.
The exercise of power by "a
few over many" takes on the colour of the human(s) who hold it in their hands. Would
Jimmy Carter have signed off on the nuclear option to force the end of the war
with Japan? Probably not. Would the current president be capable of signing it?
Both had/have it in their power to sign papers that could “fell cities.”
But “felling cities” by “the
few holding power over the many” scenario isn’t the
only manifestation of the consequences. My church has mobilized behind the desperate
need of the hungry of Gaza; many of “the many” have sacrificed in support of
this cause, only to see the Prime Minister of Israel “sign a paper” to shut off
humanitarian aid.
We say that “the pen is
mightier than the sword;” heaven help us when the pen and the sword march
together, when brutality and propaganda link arms.
Literally, many a city has
been felled in Gaza and Ukraine by the abuse of power by the few.
The preservation of
democratically elected governance is a must; the world, meanwhile, seems to have
become enamoured with watching the exercise of unstoppable power, most probably
under the delusion that that power will rub off on them. Persons with a social
conscience—whether Christian, Muslim, Buddhist, Hindu or none of these—who
believe that its efficacious to include both neighbours and strangers in
efforts to make a better world, must act. Power easily becomes ruthless and
abusive if unchecked; it doesn’t cater for public welfare but uses public
assets to bolster its hold on privilege and power.
But what can I do? So many are asking. In a functioning and fair democracy, you use your vote, of course, and campaign for the candidate with integrity and a sense of public service. Even elected governance takes the shape and colour of the people chosen.
Vote for
people, not parties.
Dictatorships, Oligarchies, Kingdoms have historically been dismantled by bloody revolutions. Best case is a democracy that recognizes the signs of approaching demagoguery and nips it in the bud, as we say. Failing that, a strike would be better than armed revolution; if many lay down their tools and refuse to work until change happens, bloodless revolution has a chance.
A boss who isn’t obeyed ceases to
be boss.
The rallying of the many is difficult;
rallying of the many, many is almost always beholden to extraordinary
leadership.
And where will such leadership be found?
No comments:
Post a Comment