Great Grandparents of a host of rakes and a few scholars |
COMMON RAKE |
UNCOMMON SCHOLAR |
“He was a rake among scholars and a
scholar among rakes.”
The sardonic description of a
certain person by Thomas Babington McAuley, 19th Century British
politician, historian and essayist, could apply to nearly everyone. It’s the
social equivalent of the Theory of Relativity; the esteem in which you’re
held—or not—depends on what company you’re in at any given time.
We are never satisfied with better,
bigger, smarter or more competent; we long to know what or who is best,
biggest, smartest or most competent of all. Olympics, the Oscars, sports playoffs,
etc. respond to that need. If we can’t determine who’s at the peak by
measuring, we devise ways to steer public opinion to a conclusion of greatness
... or mediocrity. Fact is, this mentality not only defines who’s the “scholar”
in the paradigm, but also who are the many who are clearly “rakes.”
We visited the Louvre while in Paris
and stood in line to see the storied Mona Lisa by Leonardo da Vinci. She
was roped off to keep viewers back and she’s only 30” X 21,” so our examination
was short ... and distant. I’ve seen copies of the painting often and, trust
me, it’s only as great as we make it out to be because we say it is. (I took an
Art Appreciation half course at the University of Alberta long ago, so on this
subject, I’m at least a scholar among rakes.)
Suppose the lead female actor in a
local theatre company does a fantastic job of characterizing condescension, more
nuanced and memorable than Maggie Smith (rest her soul) playing the Dowager Countess of
Grantham in Downton Abbey. One will
win a BAFTA award and heaps of money; the other will wait on tables in a chain
restaurant so she can pay the rent.
You might well imagine that there’s no mystery here; that humans can’t all be kings, not even princes, not even butlers or footmen … nor scholars; that only the village “rakery” position is freely offered to anyone who happens to land on earth unheralded, un-preordained to anything else.
A confession: I have aspired long to master prose writing like, for instance, Herman Melville in Moby-Dick. I have friends who aspire to the extraordinary in quilting, singing, playing an instrument, wood turning, baking, etc. So far I haven’t opened a booth at the town fair for selling what I’ve laboured over, but like those who do, I will put one “wooden bowl” of a poem on display. It’s not an elegy written in a churchyard, but is an elegy written after a visit to a dying father:
THOSE
WILL BE PEARLS©
i
know my
(how
do you feel, dad?
are
you better today, dad?)
sounds
like offer of a lozenge
to
a hungry man. but forgive me if you can
my
grief for you is trivialized by stammered words
i know. i feel it.
your
deep-lined face, pale bony hands
are
answers to
my
rote-learn’d clumsy questions
—what
use are words to us?
no
one remembers signing up for sterile halls,
and
stark white walls like these
i
think we know, my friends, that
somewhere
in the index of what’s truly real
where
truth lies ‘prisoned-like …
we
all enrolled by being born.
“full
fathom five grandfathers lie
those
are pearls that were their eyes.”
you
smile little, say less
perhaps
you understand me after all these years
and
what you see … amuses you?
the
dying seldom make long speeches
grant
you that
and
that was ever you
you
answer slowly, “ever is a long time, dave.”
(later
I’ll think, “why, ever is no time at all.”)
I have to go.
“I’m sorry,” I say, because I truly am
sorry for you,
who smells the coming rain
hears children laughing just across the street
can start his car and drive to any place
and work and make and break
with these still-steady hands.
praise god
and
then the sky pours down in sheets of rain and hail
I
throttle down my car, my thoughts, my world
and
weep.
“full fathom five my Dad will lie;/those will be pearls that once were his eyes.”[1]