Saturday, January 09, 2021

June 2023

June, 2023

After the Pandemic

George G. Epp

January, 2021

    

    

    


 


INTRODUCTION

 

W

e’re currently in the second wave of what history may well record as “The Great 2020 Corona Pandemic.” The pandemic has taught us a lot about ourselves, for instance that not all challenges come riding on hurricanes, bombs, tanks, asteroids, floods, fires or other big things, and so automatic weapons, drones, space force, jet fighters are useless against them. What will defeat us as a human race will be a virus, sneaking up on us as a cell so small that it would have to link tentacles with 5,000 of its fellows to span your fingernail.

          A second thing we’ve learned to our astonishment is that lies can be just as influential to many members of the human species as are facts. Whether it’s a deep-seated death wish, sheer obstinacy or the backlash against authority, many humans will be persuaded by propaganda, conspiracy theories or the idolizing of a charismatic nay-sayer, enough to walk over a cliff like the fabled lemmings of the Arctic. 

The “if we work together, we can do anything” cliché seems right now to fail on the word together. It’s not illogical to say that we won’t agree on the what-to-do in the fight against, say, COVID-19, but to respond to a democratically-reached strategy by undermining it shows both a lack of foresight and an aggressive selfishness. What is new with this pandemic is that it encompasses the entire planet, the entire human race. Not even the “world” wars distributed pain so generally.

          What the pandemic ought to teach us as well, I think, is that our inability to fight back as a species must have grown out of the lives we were living in 2019 and before. To wish everything back to normal would most likely mean that any future, similar event would find us repeating the mistakes of this one. We really must put thought into alternatives that take into account preparedness for another health threat, decisive action against climate change and corrections to social and political institutions that will encourage solidarity across parties and opinions.[1] Most pressing is better education and training in community arts, the “how to resolve conflict and come to peaceful resolutions” skills.

          It’s not hard to demonstrate that in the last half of the 20th Century and the first 5th of the 21st, we have continued to move away from self-care to canned and purchased care. For example, processed foods, delis and restaurants have freed us from a great deal of kitchen work. Homemade entertainment has—to a great extent—been swallowed up by television and the internet (for many children, I’m told, all that really gets regular exercise is the thumbs).

Our cars are vigilant for us, telling us when it’s safe to pass and when it isn’t—among all the other bells and whistles manufacturers are coming up with and that we find so attractive. Self-driving cars are in the experimentation stage, and voice activation built into all sorts of devices are advances that change life styles—in a negative direction as regards mental and physical health. For example, a culture that eats out all the time can’t be expected to possess nutrition and food preparation skills, is not as likely to be as concerned about food security as those who buy/raise food and prepare it for the table.

At the same time, a trend through the 20th Century has been toward more individualistic, less community-oriented life styles. Some attribute this to enhanced mobility; I would add electronic connectivity, reliance on the internet and information overload. My daughter lives in Panama/Mexico; we have friends who live in Saskatchewan but have a daughter living in Newfoundland/Labrador and a son in Vancouver. This would have been a rare exception in the 1920s, but is not unusual in the 21st Century. The distances, however, are made to seem less onerous by on-line messaging and the instantaneousness (is that a word?) connectivity and real-time virtual-face to virtual-face conversation.

In short, we’ve been working against both the concept of interdependent community and of the “Renaissance Man,” the person who is interested in many things, seeks knowledge about many things, strives to be able to do many things and thereby becomes familiar with, and more tolerant of, difference and change. Our technology has evolved apace; but human evolution toward an ever-higher plane[2] seems to be moving backwards toward the “dumpster man,” the one who has narrow interests, who scoffs at learning and whose skills are few and poorly developed. The phenomenon is demonstrated in the current “Trumpian Mob” mentality in the USA. Dumpster man sometimes becomes aware of his shortcomings as a person and since he’s unable to compete with educated and/or power structures, makes up for it with the conflation of truth and an imagined reality in which an invented world displaces the actual world. And in the invented world, he and those who agree with him are imaginary kings.

So, let’s assume that it’s June, 2023. Let’s imagine that an immunization program has finally brought the COVID 19 virus to heel in most of the world but that pockets of illness still persist where anti-vaxxers are numerous and in other countries with inadequate medical infrastructure and services. Lock-downs are no longer needed in Canada but masking, distancing protocols are applied occasionally as necessary and many people continue to mask when in public, closed areas, having become used to the practice and acutely aware that community spread can apply to even the common cold and ‘flu.

          At the same time, the climate change news is on a side burner, if not the front one for now, and more individual buy-in occurs because the long period of pandemic stay-at-home has subtly changed people’s expectations regarding travel, vacationing, shopping, institutions, consumption in general. Conservative governments are having to retool to regain a standing among what is now a majority that insists on climate-change action as priority number one. Progressive governments are having to scramble to find ways to re-invent social programs, economic policy, tax structures in the light of enormous debt and deficit burdens and the backlash from business and industry.

          In other words, “getting back to normal” is proving itself to be elusive because a “new normal” exists and going back isn’t a clear option.

          Just for fun, let’s imagine what the “new normal” might look like. These are informed guesses at best, and I’d appreciate comments. I may be wrong on every prediction . . . or I may be right. The point is that there is a future after COVID 19, and there are eventualities to be prepared for. So, the point is to be more prepared for the aftermath than we were for the pandemic. Think about it.


TRANSPORTATION:

T

he pandemic did a real number on travel generally. Closed borders and self-isolation—even after a simple interprovincial jaunt—decimated travel and vacation industries, all of which resulted in massive unemployment and loss of revenue. Seeing the skies and the highways open up is affecting people in different ways. Very many people lost their jobs, small business owners just gave up and by June, 2023 are so far in debt and with no savings remaining, that the booming job market will, for the time being, herald a chance to reacquire some of what was lost. For them, travel and vacations will have to wait.

          But now, ironically, the conditions that robbed some people of their livelihoods and their possessions are seeing the reverse effect among seniors and any others on pension incomes whose savings might well have grown during the stay-at-home period. Some airlines are hard-pressed to get enough planes in the air, to rehire staff enough to meet the pressing demand for winter getaways, family reunions and the simple urge to travel once again.  At the same time—and especially as long as pockets of infection remain—a lasting hesitancy lingers about places that are not home. Net effect? Some airlines are folding; others are prospering and when it all seems to have settled down, virtual meetings and visits remain the choice of many and many are saving all their rationed travel for family reunions.

          Highways are clogged with traffic as the economy heats up while the euphoria of being free to move about sets in. The fossil fuel industries are experiencing a surge as demand rises but then will likely fall back again as the economy settles down and the need to meet climate change targets reasserts.

Related to this, governments are forced to rethink public transportation. Proposals for a trans-Canada fast rail service and for commuter buses are beginning to appear. Electric cars are seen more often, but their high cost and persisting rumours of their dubious value in fighting climate change is restraining the speed of switching. Taxing the carbon footprint of everyone, of every business and institution is as commonplace as income tax used to be and rates are increasing as the necessity for meeting targets becomes more and more pressing. Gasoline is $2.25/litre at the pump and predictions are that it will rise by $.50/litre every year until it reaches ca. $5.00/litre. Filling the tank on an F-250 will set the owner back $300.00 if the prediction is true.

          On average, people’s circles of habitation and travel are shrinking. “Buy local” is becoming a more strident theme and the door is opening for entrepreneurs able to design services on a scale appropriate to local and rural communities. Carbon taxation is vastly increasing the cost of flying as well as driving; the incentive to travel to cities to shop is reduced and distance travel is most often by train or the electric busses that travel express city to city.  “Snowbird” winters are available only to the wealthiest. The sales of pickup trucks and luxury vehicles are plummeting and more and more people are finding ways to make do with one compact vehicle augmented by public transportation, bikes, electric golf carts, car-pooling and rentals.

People in rural areas are being forced to spend winter months (November to April, in many cases) near home; spas and planetariums heated by ambient sun, thermal energy and wind generators are being planned and will no doubt prove to be very popular. They will include masses of tropical- and temperate-climate plants as well as swimming/paddling pools. Families and individuals will be scheduled in for a day or more per week as it suits them and the facility’s capacity.

Ski trails and ski hills, tobogganing hills are popping up in numbers that will mean accessibility to nearly everyone; where usable hills don’t exist naturally, mounds are being planned and construction is being done. Covered ice surfaces, likewise, are planned to be accessible to nearly everyone and curling has experienced a resurgence. A few shorter surfaces and smaller rocks are expected to make the sport a hit with children.

Winters will eventually be very active, given the plans now being dreamed up and enacted.

 

COMMUNITY:

C

ommunity exists at many levels. Churches are communities as are schools, clubs, leagues, etc. Having been dormant for such a long time, such common-interest communities have restoration as their first order of business. They’re experiencing attrition as some members—having meanwhile adopted new habits and outlooks—simply aren’t coming back. Conversely, the ability to gather face to face is for others like a spring following a harsh winter, and new memberships are beginning to happen. Everyone wants to belong to something, it seems.

          Towns, villages, rural farming areas make up the bigger picture. People—by choice or necessity—are shrinking their circles, and the door is opening wider for innovative ways of servicing the community. Joint ownership, lending and borrowing, renting tools and equipment instead of buying is opening new avenues for profitable businesses and for savings for individuals.[3] We’re experiencing a renaissance of enterprise, ideas resulting in broader and better services in our communities. Inter-community cooperation is filling in the gaps; where one community lacks the population for, say, a medical clinic or a facility for career training, two or three together don’t. As these shifts are occurring, community awareness, pride and cooperation are increasing, the property tax base is growing, making community improvement possible.[4]

          Community choirs, clubs, drama groups and sports show promise of opening new opportunities for community members. In multi-ethnic centres, heightened community activity and opportunities are bringing about increased understanding and appreciation across cultures. Out-of-school activities for children and teens and opportunities for seniors are expanding as communities lean more and more on participation by all. Changes in education (see below) are driving much innovation out of sheer necessity.

          There will, of course, be detractors. Cries of “socialism, communism, the nanny-state, etc.” will be shrill and persistent. But to give everyone the range of options that pertained before 2019 has proven to be impossible. The principles of inter-dependent community is beginning to revert to a day when small towns had brass bands, when a few threshing machines and many local men harvested the community’s crops, when rural Co-ops drew local investment and both lowered prices for members and paid year-end dividends. Canadians will have to give up some of their autonomy to make the new normal work; that will be easier for some than for others.

          There’s talk about building in an opt in or opt out provision to some of the changes. This wouldn’t be new. For religious or ethical reasons, citizens in the two world wars were allowed a conscientious objector option, conservative religions have been allowed to opt out of Medicare and other government programs. It would be possible if this provision is enacted that municipal taxes would be broken down into categories so that access to ice skating facilities, for example, could be unchosen and the relevant tax foregone. Or federally, the Canada Pension Plan could be unchosen and private insurance purchased. The purpose of opt in/opt out would have to be limited, of course, since water and sewer, for instance, is a universal must have, as are many services. The option could, of course, be attractive to those pining for the individuality of the past.

          The world has become severely divided on the excuse of political leaning. What Canadian politics is searching for is a way to restore a sense of community that prevents the vitriol accompanying, for example, the split in the USA that’s led to violence and hatred across political lines.

 

EDUCATION:

I

n its struggle to maintain children’s educational progress over the past two years, our school system revealed much. Schools are not simply institutions of learning; they are also senior daycare centres. One of their essential tasks in our culture and economy has been demonstrated by the “to open schools, or not” discussions, making it apparent that schools are needed to free both parents to work and earn. For the teaching and practicing of new skills and understandings, the time spent in classrooms by our children is far greater than needed, but we’ve long accepted that between ages 6 and 16 at least, 200 days of 9:00 to 3:30 per year in a classroom is required to absorb a basic education. Meanwhile, schools can’t afford enough staff and space to keep class sizes down to optimal numbers.[5]

          There is probably no way of lowering class sizes without hiring more staff and adding infrastructure[GE1] . Meanwhile many school districts are running in the red. Some schools are going to a shift system: 12 Grade 5b class members in the morning, the other 13 in the afternoon. In order to accommodate the needs of a couple who both hold day jobs, current “work from home,” job sharing or part-time employment is becoming standard. Sports, art, music, have been removed from the school curriculum and are offered by community members with relevant skills, funded in part by user-pay and mainly by provincial governments.[6] High School students are attending as they did before, but the curriculum has been modernized to ensure that students’ leave with knowledge of their history, skills for participation in the new economy and with a toleration for diversity. Streaming follows Grade 12 as a compulsory 13th year explores, through apprenticeship placements, where a student should pursue further education. Dropping out is not an option; education is free up to and including the first three years of post secondary.

Continuing education has been expanded; evening classes in the arts and hobbies as well as political and economic theory, ethics, health, homemaking arts and theology are available on a pay as you go basis. A portion of tuition is returned upon completing a course satisfactorily.[7]

 

POLITICS:

P

olitics in Canada has been stuck in an archaic rut for years now. There’s little to choose between Ottawa of the present and the British parliamentary system of several hundred years ago. First-past-the-post elections are like a built-in disincentive to the public to become involved, even to vote. The combative party politics on the hill is wasteful of talent and reinforces a divisiveness in the electorate. With 39% of the votes cast in their favour, a party can come to be 100% in charge; the remaining members form “the opposition,” a considerable body—generally—of talented people who have little to do beyond dredging up scandal on the government and planning how they might do better in the next election.

          Pressure for changes has come to enjoy broad support. Proportional representation is likely only one election away, the senate is being abolished as of January 1, 2025 and the chamber refitted to house a brand new “Nations’ Parliament,” a body with equal First Nations and non-First Nations representation whose sole task is to tend the treaty relationship and to formulate and present to the government proposals for their ratification.

          The Prime Minister is no longer automatically the leader of the majority party, although he/she might be. After elections, the parliament meets as a committee of the whole and for the first week, names persons to ministerial positions with each party contributing to cabinet as many as their share of the popular vote suggests, and the cabinet then meets to choose a Prime Minister, either from among them or from the legislature membership generally. Right now, the legislature is being reconfigured so seating is as circularly arranged as possible and members are seated by lot and not by party.

The speaker of parliament is appointed by the Governor-General out of the general population. 

          Governments serve for four years. The past convention of an election being triggered by a vote lost in parliament is abolished . . . because all parties are represented in cabinet and on the legislative floor, a failed bill is reworked or discarded since an arrival at consensus replaces the adversarial functioning of the past. All votes are free votes so on any given bill, a member of any party is free to support or oppose. Cabinet bills receive first priority, but MPs are able to introduce bills provided the request is signed by a given number of supporters.[8]

          Another political change is being heralded by the Well-being Economy movement. It was formed before the pandemic by Scotland, Iceland and New Zealand (all of whom had women as prime ministers) and had as a goal the displacement of Gross Domestic Product as the primary measure of the nations’ success with a well-being yardstick. In other words, governance goals are set with the health, living conditions and general well-being of the population as priority number one. Canada will be joining this network along with Australia and Ethiopia in the new year. As an example arising from this new emphasis, the Canadian government has adopted a policy that will tie the decline in the oil industry to start-up assistance in the manufacture and installation of renewable energy projects, thus ensuring steady employment for the populations of Alberta, Saskatchewan and Newfoundland and Labrador. Subsidies for oil exploration and development are being withdrawn gradually to avoid economic shock.

 

HOMES AND HOUSING:

M

iddle- and upper-class people in the West have more than one reason to buy a house. Along with the car(s) they drive, their houses serve to display their worth, their success, their tastes, their “style.” In houses, bigger sends a better signal than smaller and so as a general rule, persons/families occupy more house than they need. At the extreme, Jennifer Aniston owns a $20,000,000 home in Bel Air. It has 10,000 square feet of living space, 11 bathrooms and 7 bedrooms. [9] Meanwhile on the Shamattawa First Nation in Manitoba, all four bedrooms in a 1200 square-foot house are occupied and people are sleeping on the floors.[10] In the first example, 10,000 square feet per person; in the second, 109 square feet per person. The price of Aniston’s house could build 108 comfortable new homes in Shamattawa. The chief there says they need, but can’t get, 30.

Now (June, 2023) people are seeing the handwriting on the wall. Heating a large home is costing an average of $400-500 a month,[11] municipal taxes have gone up by a lot and the Federal Carbon Tax has tripled since it was legislated in 2018, and many have learned that when mortgage payments are added, they simply can’t afford a home that is either too big for them now, or will be when all the kids have left home. As a result, larger-house prices are tanking and there’s a shortage of condo and rental units.[12]

          The pandemic of 2020-22 warned us about the vulnerability of the elderly, particularly those in for-profit care homes. Meanwhile, fees are such that OAS plus the supplement has to be augmented by personal savings or a contribution from some family source. Seniors living with their children is becoming common; home care visits to assist with their care is available and the income from parents living-in is helping many to stay in their homes.

At the same time, some remodelling of homes is being done so children—even married ones with their own children—can live “at home” with husband’s or wife’s parents. People are looking to Europe, Asia and the Southern Americas for models of extended-family-home practices. Nursing homes for the severely compromised elderly still exist, of course, but they’re public facilities carry on as before, but more and more, are branches of existing hospitals.

 

CHURCH

T

he word church conjures up abundant images. A building is a church, the congregation that meets inside it is church, and then there’s the universal church founded when Jesus said of Peter that he was the rock on which Christ’s church would be built.[13] One way to find out if what you’re looking at is church is to ask participants if their group pays taxes; organized churches are exempt.

          Now (June, 2023), churches with substantial memberships are beginning to carry on as they did before the pandemic, although some things are new. Developments in the economy, particularly, have forced some of these changes while other changes emanate from people’s consciousness regarding the recent pandemic and the experiences it put them through. Shrinking of communities geographically has meant that churches are becoming less and less attached to conferences, more and more self administered and regulated. This has been disaster for small, old-line congregations and less so for those denominations that were locally administered before, like Anabaptist streams and independent “Gospel” churches. Fundamentalist congregations are doing some painful soul-searching regarding the events of the pandemic, trying to find consistency among their health fears, their relationship to government agencies and directives, and their reliance on God in times of stress. This is costing them some of the more disillusioned members.

          Since members in organized churches are getting by with less income, so giving has flagged. Many were struggling to survive before the pandemic, and they are now finding themselves unable to hire a full-time pastor, or any pastor at all for that matter. Those churches that have a motivated, committed membership are finding ways to continue the teaching, organizing, preaching, and serving functions through committees and lay ministry. Finding consistent lay-leadership is the key for many as no organization can survive if clear permission to lead is absent. Churches already in difficulty with low membership and minimum resources are closing, amalgamating or dispersing with many members joining larger congregations. A few members of demised churches have decided to form house churches.

          What has been sad and difficult for the many small denominational congregations has been rather a boost for ecumenism; the sense of the church universal has been awakened by the experience of a threat-to-life universal, and this consciousness has made it easier for Christians to seek community across traditional theological divides.

 

FOOD

T

he basics of food security were already in the Western vocabulary before the pandemic. Home gardening was on the increase, farmers’ markets were popular and the 100-mile diet was the extreme end of a push to support local food growing and processing.

          Now (June 2023) with the consolidation of stronger, more self-sufficient local communities, the trend mentioned above has sped up considerably. Lawns are being turned into vegetable patches, numerous families are building hen houses in their backyards, schools have gardens and food growing is part of the curriculum. Stores have found that to remain competitive, they have to have a section dedicated to locally grown, locally cooked and baked, locally preserved food. Some farms have diversified by adding acres to crops designated for the local market . . . wheat for local milling, more barley for more beer, lentils, soy beans and chick peas for protein substitutes, potatoes, corn, peas, destined for those augmenting their income by preserving and processing local food for the local market.

          Home industries are booming while at the same time, some are growing into small factories employing a few people: craft beer & Saskatoon wine, nutrition bars, potato chips, jams & jellies, meat products (after the models of Carmen Corner Meats and Pineview Farms), dried fruits, specialty cheeses, wood and fabric crafts, and . . . the list limited only by lack of imagination. Exotic foods, spices, wines and spirits, etc. are still imported but the pandemic interfered with supply lines and many items are only sporadically available. People are relearning the nutritional value in locally grown foods and the planting of Saskatoon berry trees, apple trees, plum trees, cherry trees is keeping plant and tree nurseries busy.

          Locally grown fruits including blackberries, blueberries, saskatoons, strawberries, raspberries, chokecherries, pin cherries, haskap berries, gooseberries, shrub and tree cherries and apples are beginning to replace imported fruit more and more as berry/cherry/apple plantations spring up.[14] Temperature and humidity-controlled facilities for storage are springing up as business enterprises on their own. Gradually, the trend toward big box stores and corporate food production sucking up local enterprise is being reversed and profits from food production are again recycling through local economies.[15]

          Feasts, dinners, evenings out at bars and restaurants are more popular than they ever were before the pandemic. The “town square” phenomenon—meeting places for hanging out with friends and strangers on summer evenings—has been a great outlet for people pinching pennies out of necessity. In cold climates, hockey arena and curling rink foyers and newly-constructed indoor games and fitness arenas are becoming “town squares” in winter. One thing the pandemic has taught us is that social gathering is good for human health and spirit. Food and drink will always be present wherever and whenever people gather.

 

MONEY

T

he love of money is at the root of what often turns into evil behaviour.” We’re familiar with that sentiment as well as, “Money can’t buy happiness,” and other maxims that decry a dependence on accumulating money. We mouth them, but don’t believe them. Even among Christians, I’d venture to say that many would sell Saint Paul if he’d bring them a price to make their dreams come true, so much so that we now have a prosperity gospel, a heresy that says money is a reward from God for the people he loves, a sentiment as contrary to what Jesus taught as can be imagined.

          Beginning after the turn of the century, the disappearance of paper money began and an accelerating decline was evident as Bitcoin was born. We were all used to money that wasn’t bills and coins, but notations in a bank or credit union. For many, though, money that couldn’t be hidden under mattresses or folded into a wallet was scary. Seniors refused direct deposit; they needed to hold a cheque in their hands, even though it then turned to a number in a bank or credit union and vanished when deposited. Long ago when food was primarily grown and raised locally and bartering eggs for milk, a side of beef for 50 hours of labour, people measured worth and exchange rates at a very practical level. The introduction of tokens to place-hold value when you “sold” milk but didn’t need eggs was symbolic of the birth of money.

          During the pandemic, very little physical token (bills and coins) changed hands; exchange of value for value was done by debit card, credit card, e-transfer, direct deposit and the odd cheque sent through the postal service. Physical exchanges, after all, gave opportunity for the virus to spread. Now (June, 2023) the exchange of physical money is almost unheard of; phones read debit cards and face-to-face transfers are expedited in seconds; new laws and better security on the internet have people beginning to have confidence in the system.

          Another thing the pandemic did was to illuminate the wide division between the rich and poor. After small, incremental changes to make sure everyone had means to feed and house themselves and their families, welfare programs of all kinds will soon be discarded to be replaced by a guaranteed annual income starting in 2025. There’s great resistance to this, of course, the standard objection being that it will eliminate the will to work for a living. A counter argument might be that adult’s main work is to raise good families, educated and knowledgeable children and that given the assurance of necessities provided, the increasingly self-contained communities will require a great deal of volunteerism. Furthermore, automation, artificial intelligence and robotics have so reduced the need for manual labour that the opportunity to earn a living with a job is not what it once was. For many, we’re finding, the need to be out and about, to be a contributor and, yes, to earn a living with a job is strong, the opportunity to live a lifestyle beyond that enabled by a GAI a real incentive.

          If, and how much, GAI an individual is entitled to is calculated like a reverse income tax. One year’s income tax report sets the amount for the next fiscal year; any overpayment or underpayment in one year is balanced out at next year’s tax calculation. OAS, CPP, Child benefits are all collapsed into the GAI program and much waste is cut out of the system because people with high incomes don’t need or receive any transfers from government.[16]

          The government had, of course, to come up with a reasonable budget given such a large shift in the way government services to individuals would be offered. Actuarial estimates, however, have indicated that the cost to government will not be much more than now. Visualized is a gain in better nutrition, better housing, better education and better communities with less addiction and less crime. That is, if the practices in education suggested above can actually become reality.

          Revising the tax system has been a real challenge. In broad strokes, wealth will be taxed far more realistically beginning in 2025. Middle classes will also find that their tax bill is considerably higher than before. Corporations will also pay a higher percentage of earnings into the countries general revenues. The big issue has been the argument that like the guaranteed annual income, the curbing of the opportunity to become wealthy, even super-wealthy, will act as a disincentive to entrepreneurship, innovation and research generally. A similar argument is also applied to corporate tax increases.

          Stock markets and the way stocks are traded will be regulated much more stringently. It’s now recognized that speculation as a way of earning a living creates a downside for the economy. Stocks purchased will not be allowed to be resold for a specified time still to be decided. Speculative trading on currencies is prohibited. The stock market currently operates like a casino; the only way the general public can participate in it is by bearing the fruits of events like the disaster of 2008, when minimal regulation allowed the real estate market along with cooperating banks and trust companies to collapse under the weight of over-extended futures trading and the speculative dealing in mortgages.

          Money is power. When money accumulates into the billions of dollars under the control of a corporation or individual, power to influence policy goes with it. A review of a book I have yet to read traces the growth of wealth, power and political influence in the Trump and Kushner clans[17]; the primary methodology behind their rises was engineered via political contributions and the concomitant stroking of the people in positions of influence.  

 

IMMIGRATION, REFUGEES, GLOBALIZATION

O

ne of the primary purposes of borders is the control of population, how many inhabit a political jurisdiction, and who, and under what conditions. The nation state is a relatively new phenomenon in the historical scope of things and the demarcation of borders developed, in part, from necessity because of ballooning populations and easier, faster mobility.

Prior to this development, empires rose and fell, of course. In practice, they sought to gain control over as many of the people and as much of the earth’s resources as possible. In effect, empires—like the Roman—militarily enslaved as much of the known world as possible. (Incidentally, our Bible is an excellent source for researching the conditions of life for the enslaved of empires, and for learning about the motivations and methods of those who enslaved.)

Later manifestations of empire arrived with the invention of sea-going ships. Beginning with the Portuguese and Spaniards, European countries competed to colonize as much of the “newly-discovered” world as possible.[18] Great Britain, as we know, excelled in this race and to this day we have the Commonwealth of Nations, a largely symbolic organization of former British colonies, Canada being but one.[19] Most of the nation states that were once part of the largest empire ever to exist are now independent.

So much for the historical sketch. Through racist attitudes and ethnic sensibilities, through religious and cultural animosities, through need for what Hitler called, “Lebensraum,” or living space, humanity has managed to live on the edge of inter-group and inter-personal tension that has regularly broken out in international or civil conflict. Add to this the 2020 pandemic and climate change that has caused and will continue to cause the turning of formerly-habitable areas into wastelands and we see what we see now in 2023, enormous pressure by groups—sometimes masses—of people seeking to find new homes in better places on the planet. Some come to our borders as refugees, some apply for permission to immigrate but in either case, the debate about how many, and who, is ongoing.

Now (June 2023), the numbers of people in United Nations refugee camps are in the tens of millions. Projections are that there will soon be more people languishing in such make-shift camps than there are people in Canada. Our government has raised the refugee admission numbers to 50,000 per year and many see only the dark side of that—too many seeking jobs in an already tight market, ghettos forming around ethnic groups’ attempts to recreate “home,” and, of course, the continuing effect of racism and the misconception that Canada is a white, Christian country and should remain so.

Meanwhile, Canada’s ability to provide food relief has been declining. Climate change has meant that a few pockets of arable land can be farmed now that couldn’t be before, but the reverse exceeds this benefit by far; the southern prairies are experiencing drought years, sometimes alternating with extremely wet years so that average grain output has declined. Agriculture is attempting to adjust by trying new, less-fragile crops but their efforts are hampered by the increasing “Buy America,” “Buy Canada” sensibility which has meant that input supplies and equipment are selling at ever-inflating prices.

Population control smacks of eugenics, dictatorial government. The subject is coming up more and more often. Among families whose history here goes back generations, the fertility rate falls well under 2, meaning that the average number of children each female bears is too few to maintain population numbers.[20] Many women bear no children, so those that do need to make up for this by having more than 2.

The new normal, then, has Western countries becoming increasingly more multi-cultural, multi-lingual, multi-religious, multi-ethnic. Much more attention is paid now to settlement in hopes of avoiding ghettos, but since Canada is a cold country, and since its citizens are able to move about freely, this is almost a lost cause. Helping newcomers acclimatize to life in Canada has become a profession. English classes, cultural classes, survival classes all need practitioners. The hope is, of course, that the “new normal” will actually be “normal.”

The most difficult hurdle now is the same one that made it difficult to beat the pandemic back, and that is the cohort that, for one reason or another, refuses to cooperate in the efforts to make the new normal, normal. Perhaps it’s simply an inability or an unwillingness to let go of what was but will never come again. With the most strident anti-progress people, sabotage and violence, the formation of rag-tag militias is a development that was boosted during the pandemic and the divisive presidency of Donald Trump, and remains extremely worrisome.

On the other hand, schools and community-organized, after-school activities are achieving exactly what is needed in some places, that being a well-planned program where children grow up more and more in multi-cultural environments. This has led to another occupation for citizens; one can choose to undergo training as a community facilitator in the area of children’s out-of-school education.

The end of rampant globalism has affected people’s attitudes toward foreign aid. As communities become more and more independent, the news of events abroad receives less and less attention, garners less and less interest. Charities are focused primarily on local needs; giving for international programs is drying up. The plight of refugees unable to find refuge goes largely unnoticed. Epidemics sweep through the crowded, unsanitary camps attempting to house and feed these many thousands, but they die un-mourned and unnoticed while the First World preoccupies itself with the safety of its own citizens.

 

HEALTHCARE

P

robably the most striking lessons learned in the school of the pandemic had to do with healthcare, its strengths and weaknesses. Notably the lack of preparedness is still in review and the conclusion has been that henceforth, Canada needs to have in storage enough personal protective equipment to cover even the unthinkable, worst case scenario. Hospital construction and expansion of current hospitals have become priorities. Besides increasing capacity, elective surgery, acute and intensive care are beginning to respond much more quickly and thoroughly to citizen’s needs. Many private nursing homes are being phased out or taken over by government and where necessary, wings or floors are being added to hospitals for those not able to cope with home and family care alone.

Registered Nursing training institutions have seen their quotas doubled and medical schools have increased intake by one-third.

          A new category focused on illness prevention has been added to both medical and nursing schools. Although protests of invasion of privacy—as expected—are expressed, homes with neonate, nursery school, middle school aged children are visited at home monthly or more for a safety, wellness and nutrition assessment, except where conditions make it obviously unnecessary. These community health workers have enough medical training to spot conditions that might result in hospital care or worse and are often the first responders to drug addiction, malnutrition, communicable disease and mental illness. They are able to prescribe from a list of basic drugs and therapies and work closely with school and playground personnel and any other institutions that share responsibility for children in need.  

          As a result of the increased manpower put into acute care staffing and facilities and the focus on prevention, visits to doctors have been lengthened without reducing remuneration. More detailed exploration of general health is required and improvements to ambience are being made to all facilities where illness is being assessed or treated. The focus has shifted so the doctor visit is unhurried, is made in a pleasant environment and lifestyle (nutrition, exercise, relationships, money matters, etc.) questions are addressed, again as a preventative strategy.

          Following a European model, health spas are located at Watrous and Moose Jaw in Saskatchewan and in appropriate places in other provinces. They are primarily mental health therapy sites and doctors prescribe days, weeks, or months of therapy where applicable. Physical therapies that are best conducted in water are also prescribed spa stays. Trained personnel are, of course, the backbone of the spas’ effectiveness.

          The World Health Organization and the United Nations have spearheaded an alert system that ensures the emergence of a new viral threat is made known world wide, and immediately. There has been great cooperation at the General Assembly of the UN and there are signs that this will become a health communication network useful in times of natural disasters as well.

 

WORK

G

et a job!” has long been shorthand for anyone relying on others’ resources to survive. It would be interesting, I think, to go back through history and pre-history to catalogue the ways in which individuals, families and communities obtained food for the table. My father had a job as a teacher after his post-secondary education but the pay was so low and the children arrived in such numbers that he had to augment his salary with some livestock. Later, we raised our own food in a garden and ate eggs, poultry and beef. Later, we expanded the dairy and purchased much of our food with proceeds from selling milk.

          I have always depended on a teacher’s salary and now a teacher’s pension, plus CCP and OAS to pay for food, housing, etc.

          Jobs for professionals and service industry workers are more plentiful now (June 2023) than they have ever been; automation, artificial intelligence and robotics, however, are decimating the blue collar and unskilled labour opportunities. As it has been since the Industrial Revolution, means of production are owned by individuals or groups of individuals—if they’re partnerships or public corporations. The object is the production of a product or service that will sell for more than the cost of making or delivering it. Labour is a cost, and automation allows enterprises to make more money, and that’s the bottom line and the reason for doing anything from milking cows to clerking in a store to manufacturing widgets.

          If you look back to the EDUCATION section, you’ll see that the growth in professional and service work vs labour means that more and broader education is required. There will be room, of course, for cleaners and garbage collectors and machine operators, but for the uneducated, unskilled person, the catalogue of options is shrinking.

 

ENTERTAINMENT

T

he permission to deliver and attend live performances has resulted in a sizeable increase in attendance at plays, concerts and movie theatres. In part, this is no doubt reactive to isolation during the pandemic. Amateur musicianship has also experienced a new dawning, probably for the same reason; community dances, seniors’ venues and fairs are again looking for affordable entertainment. Church choirs, school choirs, children’s choirs seem to have acquired a new polish and participation is encouraging.

          Now (June 2023) a thirst for live entertainment is general, perhaps because people are fed up with afternoons and evenings of Netflix and Acorn. And for those for whom shopping has always been a kind of entertainment, “shop ‘til you drop” seems to be a flavour of the day. Wardrobes need replenishing, furniture has worn out (especially seat cushions) houses are cleaned and polished and beauty in one’s surroundings for a change has boosted sales figures of big-box stores like Walmart and Costco enormously.

          Some people formed habits of family entertainment that seem to be lingering: family music, table games, puzzles, cross-country skiing, etc. and the hope is that it will persist; family solidarity and community consciousness can’t be bad for anyone. Moving music education out of the public school and into the community mornings or afternoons (depending on school schedule) is having the effect of greater community involvement and awareness when, for instance, seniors go to the park or to the recreation centre to hear a children’s choir practicing, or to watch soccer drills or a volleyball game.

 

THE INTERNET

T

he internet absorbed many an hour for many a stay-at-home person during the pandemic. On-line shopping boomed, giving a floundering Canada Post a second life—for the duration, at least. Internet providers also found the venue bursting with options and possibilities. Visual meeting options were improved and many learned to use them; new gaming choices popped up almost daily; streaming of everything from movies to church services provided means to communicate and be entertained from the recliner.

          The heavy demands on bandwidth challenged service providers to upgrade which in turn meant acquiring money for improvements; a lot of advertising had to be sold. Indeed, ads pervaded every platform from social networks to news to YouTube in order to keep the cost to the consumer competitively cheap.

          Now (June 2023) it’s become apparent that those who want complete deregulation of the internet have become a minority. Our government has legislated controls that tax internet providers heavily. Providers of social networks are required to apply strict censorship of libelous material. The manipulation of consumers by profiling them and targeting ads and news specifically to those profiles has been made illegal. The problems of spam and hacking have been largely solved with new software that provides universal detection of privacy invasion. The internet now has the primary goals of providing quality, searchable information and easy-to-use communication.

          The option of buying a service or being subjected to advertising is broadened now to include the entire internet. People pay roughly $120-$200 annually to opt out of all advertising. How much they pay depends on which apps they opt out of when registering. For instance, if you want access to only one or none of the social networking sites, your annual bill would decrease by, say, $3.00.

          To level the technical playing field a bit, Canada Post has developed a fast communication alternative to the physical letter specifically for those who lack computer skills or hardware. A handwritten or typed page or pages or pictures can be fed through a reader in the PO to be converted into PDF format and deposited on-line in the email inbox of the recipient. All that’s required is an email address and a few dollars for the service. Likewise, the response can be emailed to the post office who will print and place the paper copy in the originator’s physical mailbox. All that’s needed in this case is a box number and a postal code. A senior might well send an urgent question to a granddaughter in Singapore and wait in the post office for the reply.

          The above illustrates again that the pandemic made us aware of how we’ve neglected the needs of the elderly and the handicapped.

Those who lived through the pandemic with hope and in cooperation with the medical professions and government directives seem to have come out better people than before. Those who defied authority throughout have gone on to rail against other innovations. They share at least some of the responsibility for its having taken three years to beat back the virus to the point where our relationships, our economies could return to a semblance of normality.

IN CONCLUSION

T

he possibilities I’ve suggested come without any guarantees. In fact, they may not hit the mark on any eventuality whatsoever. What I hope they do is get us thinking about both shaping and fitting into the new reality. In that light, I challenge readers to respond to any of the suggestions with their take on what might more likely be the case.

          Meanwhile, I’ve compiled a list of things we could begin to plan for IF what I’ve predicted comes true:

·        Begin to downsize now or you may not be able to afford what you currently have in 2023. Things you possibly like but don’t need should be the first to go.

·        Educate yourself. Learn how economies work, how democratic governance works, how the medical profession functions. The internet judiciously used is all you need, but do consult reputable websites.

·        Make friends of schools. Join support groups, volunteer at special events like track meets. Give tutoring assistance. In general, become part of education as it will become the backbone of the social contract of the future.

·        Involve yourself in the community. Sit in on a council meeting and make representations to councils and governments on important issues.

·        Become more tech savvy. Take a course; practice and practice touch typing. Wean yourself of the endless parade of triviality urged upon us via the internet and begin to use it as a tool. For instance, Google something like humanism and learn what that movement is about.

·        Begin a routine exercise regimen; thousands are available online geared to different ages. Walk when practical, with a friend or on your own; the latter is a great activity allowing for simultaneous meditation.

·        Read more, both fiction and non-fiction. We’re finding that social media are damaging reading stamina. Typically, people scroll through entries, click “Like,” not in response to the content (of which they’ve probably only read the first line) but because it was posted by a friend.[21]

·        Moderate your activity on the internet. Dialogue easily slides into banter. Too much banter on a platform reduces the likelihood of its being used for serious discussion.

·        Whatever you repost is YOU. Keep it in mind.

·        Learn to play an instrument. Start with a recorder or a ukulele if this is new territory for you.

·        Break some old habits; the new normal may break them for you at a time when you’re less amenable to the challenge. (Cigarette and liquor taxes will triple or more: a pack of 20 cigarettes will cost $35.00 or more and a cheap bottle of wine about the same.)

·        Participate as you can in keeping your church family intact. Phone people, video-chat with others, go walking if you can with a friend(s), support your pastor and council and make sure you appreciate their work. Donate regularly and generously to your church’s budget.

·        Family, community and economic ties are going to be more and more important. Find ways to nourish all of these. Phone your j*****s brother in Timbuctoo for a change.

·        Get vaccinated! In the field of health, no advance has been as significant in saving lives and preventing debilitation and disfigurement than vaccines. In our time of pandemic, no procedure has a better hope of winning the war.

·        Attune yourself to nature by going out in it and becoming as informed as possible about the human relationship to plants and animals. Live green! (See Green Living | Green America on the web for a plethora of ideas.)

IF YOU’VE MADE IT THIS FAR, LET ME KNOW WHAT YOU ARE ANTICIPATING REGARDING “AFTER THE PANDEMIC” AND COMMUNICATE IT BY EMAIL AND I’LL POST IT ON FACEBOOK, WITH OR WITHOUT IDENTIFYING ITS SOURCE AS YOU WISH. TO DO SO, CLICK ON THE EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW:

gg.epp41@gmail.com

 

 

∞



[1] In Canada, talk of replacing “first past the post” with “proportional representation” in electing our politicians has been discussed often but without any action taken. The USA lamented the glaring weakness in its electoral system just now, to the point where leaders feared for their democracy. Socially, the equal representation of women in business, the work force and politics needs to speed up. Just like a healthy legislature benefits from both conservative and liberal views, all our institutions need the influence of men and women as well as the non-cis population included in proportion to their numbers.

[2] There’s strong evidence that humans evolved down two branches with the Africa-originating homo sapiens moving northward and encountering there their cousin branch, the Neanderthals. Reasons for the extinction of the Neanderthal branch are speculated to have been a competition for space, or a dramatically sudden change in climate, but that’s speculative. Earth’s population in general has 1% to 2% residue of Neanderthal genes in its makeup, which indicates intermarriage and reminds me of the very odd references to the legends of the Nephilim in Genesis 6 and Numbers 13. See (Neanderthal - Wikipedia) for more.

[3] Part of the reason for individuals’ and family’s having to economize will result from the massive government debt accumulated before and during the pandemic and the need to repay it. As in Denmark, the population will get used to paying nearly half of their taxable income to federal, provincial and municipal governments. Education will be better, but will cost more. Medical care likewise in that preparedness for another epidemic or pandemic will require increasing supplies and staffing, increased post-secondary training spots for teachers, nurses and doctors.

[4] In fact, in an inter-dependent community, sweat equity can save a great deal of money.

[5] What the optimal number in a classroom is varies with the age, teachability of a given group. As a teacher of high school classes, I decided that 12 and a maximum of 15 would be workable for instruction could be individualized: I generally had 25+. I took my Physics 101 in a lecture theatre at the University of Saskatchewan with, probably, 60 or 70 other undergrads. With hyperactive (ADHD) or aggressive kids, one can be one too many some days.

[6] Example: Bill and Maggie have 2 boys, one in Grade 3 and one in Grade 6. Both boys are in school from 8:00 to 12:30. Maggie or Bill work from home during the same time or one of them finds part-time employment that can be done while the boys are in school. In the afternoon, the boys are at the community centre, one in hockey practice and the other in a band for a term. (Alternately, they might attend school from 1:00 to 4:30.)

[7] This is critical; in an age of rapid changes in democracies, news flashes and sound and picture bites are not enough to enable understanding of issues for one. Also, the openness to learning in the adult population helps to cement the value of education in children and youth.

[8] The question of whether a member of parliament represents his or her constituency or his or her party has always been. Most democracies have come to define their political agenda as tied to parties such that the absurd question, “are you voting for the person or the party?” is actually relevant. Most voters are not well-schooled on party policies but have an allegiance to one or the other party that might go back generations. Breaking this unbending allegiance to parties as opposed to policies and persons is one goal of governance reform.

[11] In 2017, the cost of heating for 24 units plus common areas in my condo building was $31.25/unit. Hydro in my unit averages $60.00/mo., the condo fee was $265.00 per month and municipal tax was $3,100 or $254/mo. (heating included in the condo fee). Occupancy cost in total, $579/month.

[12] It could be argued that upper- and upper-middle-class spending trickles down to provide employment and boosts the economy so everyone benefits. The “trickle down” effect has long been debunked; high earners and the wealthy have options for spending and much money goes overseas, is spent on elaborate vacations abroad, is hoarded (savings) and, in short, taken out of circulation in the domestic economy. Building for the poor also creates jobs, but every dollar earned by lower-middle and lower classes is of necessity spent back into the domestic economy.

[13] It’s doubtful that Jesus ever said this; in his time, “church” was not a concept and in any case, it’s hard to imagine that his intention at his leaving was to found what we now call “church.” Far more likely is the possibility that he hoped to see his followers take up the work of building a new synagogue, a new temple. Early Christianity before Paul’s and Peter’s missionary efforts reveals a movement more than a church.

[14] For the nutritional breakdown of several members of this group, please see 11 Reasons Why Berries Are Among the Healthiest Foods on Earth (healthline.com).

[15] This is not good news for the long-haul trucking, rail and sea shipping, but supports the reduction in fossil fuel pollution demanded by the general public. Fossil fuel producing provinces are late to the game, but are resigning themselves to diversification, much of it driven by communities in their jurisdiction.

[16] An example: a widow with small children files her income tax. It’s a new form with many questions about her housing, her health, the ages of her children, etc. Based on her filing, a formula grants her an income of a basic amount for each person in the household. There are numerous variations, but the goal with single parents is that they are able to parent full-time, as if that were their job, and that the standard of living for the family be similar to the average in the area. Down the street lives a man who owns a chain of car washes and shows on his return an income of $225,000. He is ineligible for any GAI, of course, and is expected to invest in a pension plan for his old age. After retirement, he will still file and if through circumstances, the self-administered pension plan is inadequate to his needs, he may become eligible for GAI to bring him up to the living standard of the average neighbour.

 

[17] In American Oligarchs, WNYC’s Andrea Bernstein details the power grabs of a new political dynasty. Read the review at American Oligarchs Kushner Trump Book Review - Bloomberg

[18] A source for understanding the mentality behind subjugation of people and the colonization of already occupied habitat can be found by reading about The Doctrine of Discovery, which gave “Christian” explorers (and Europeans of the 1400s would virtually all fall into this category) the right to claim ownership of any lands “discovered” if inhabitants were not themselves Christians (virtually all of peoples outside Europe and North Africa would be in this category). For more, see What is the Doctrine of Discovery? - Doctrine of Discovery.

[19] For further discussion of this, see British Empire - Wikipedia.

[20] Men don’t bear children, and since the numbers of men are roughly equal to the number of women, each woman has to give birth at least to one child to replace herself and another child to replace one man. To maintain the population numbers, then, the “fertility rate” needs to be at least 2. For a quick education on population and fertility rates, see Fertility Rate - Our World in Data.


 [GE1]


Thursday, September 24, 2020

Me, You, our Kids and Vaccines

 

Six Questions I have for those who oppose vaccination: 



1)      I’ve often heard it said that declining on the offer of vaccinations for their children is a parent’s right. But is it not the child—a developing, independent human being—whose rights are at stake here?

2)      When the polio, rubella, mumps (or any of the other communicable illnesses against which vaccines have protected us) reappear in the anti-vaxxer community—as they have already begun to do—will the victims begin to charge care-givers with failing to provide the necessities of life? (Click Here for Information)

3)      The use of vaccines is not a simple “yes” or “no” and “done” proposition. Vaccines are never 100% effective until “herd immunity” curtails the spreading of infections person to person. In other words, the vaccinated and unvaccinated populations will both be made more and more vulnerable if the number of unprotected persons reaches a percentage such that community re-infection again becomes a factor. Does the majority, vaccinated community have a right to deny unvaccinated children or adults permission to associate with the vaccinated population in schools, churches, playgrounds, etc.? In other words, do vaccinated persons have rights of self-protection on this issue too?

4)      Is the argument that vaccines contain materials alien to the human body a logically valid reason to decline? Then what about the acetylsalicylic acid in Aspirin, I wonder? What about life-saving insulin harvested from pigs? What about the monosodium glutamate and other additives in processed foods? Don’t we ingest, inhale substances daily that are “alien to the human body?” Smoke, soot, carbon monoxide, hydrogen sulphide, methane are just a few of the foreign substances in the air we breathe. Don’t consumed-substances effects provide the reason to decline or participate in the ingestion of any and all substances?

5)      Why is there a social-media campaign against application of vaccines? Does the exercise of anti-vaxxers right to choose require that everyone buy into that viewpoint if possible, or is the campaign simply meant to ensure that the choice to vaccinate or not be left open?

6)      Evidence of the effectiveness of vaccines in combating communicable disease is absolutely clear and proven. Does the anti-vaxxing lobby have equally convincing evidence that not-vaccinating has positive outcomes and prevents negative outcomes, and if so, what are those outcomes and what is that evidence? (Click Here for information.) 

I wonder about these issues and have never had an opportunity to discuss the questions in a friendly, unbiased conversation. I invite people to respond to the questions, all of which come from a biased person (me) who presently considers forgoing vaccinations against communicable illness a big, big mistake.

            As we have heard repeatedly, Covid 19 vaccines are being tested; vaccinating or not may soon become a very real and immediate issue.

            But I’m listening, and given logical and supported answers, am prepared to change my mind, as—I would hope—we all are.

Thursday, August 27, 2020

Ghosts of the Purple Sage Riders

 



In the opening chapter of Zane Grey’s Riders of the Purple Sage, an independent, Mormon-raised rancher-woman is approached by an elder and a posse of 7 men to settle what to them is a major transgression. Jane has in her employ a “Gentile” cowpoke and they want him gone from Utah territory. He’s encouraged toward this end by threats of a severe beating and is tied up in preparation. i

And then, a lone rider on a magnificent black horse approaches, drawing everyone’s attention and delaying the process of doing away with the “Gentile” cowboy. It is, of course, Lassiter, magnificent in black leather and two low-slung holsters, stopping to water his horse. He’s humble, almost obsequious in his request, but only until he’s apprised of the situation and the dilemma of the Gentile. The story follows the general motif of the Western novel; the “bad guys” slink away in fear of the righteous gunslinger, a helpless vagrant is saved and a beautiful, rich young woman is vindicated.

It’s my opinion that what made Westerns so popular (Zane Grey was probably the first writer-millionaire in America) has echoed down the corridor of American history to emerge in 2016 in the election of another Lassiter to be president. The world of the “Wild West” was once characterized by violent crime, both organized and serendipitous, and justice was of the vigilante sort. Mormons, Indians, Mexicans, cattle rustlers took turns being the bad guys; the good guys longed for a Lassiter to protect them. With the coming of settlement and official, organized law enforcement and the marginalizing and subduing of the displaced Aboriginal population, the Wild West gave way to more orderly democracy and a new social contract. But the longings for real or imagined enemies, and the adulation for Lassiters to banish them lived on, vicariously through the popular novels and movies, literally in hibernation in the culture and politics of the country.

Lassiter is a hero in the novel even before anyone knows or cares if he passed or flunked grade school. He’s not wanted for his erudition, wisdom or broad knowledge; he’s wanted for the willingness and ability to do what he does: vanquish a gang of 8 bad guys, in a shoot-out if necessary.

Shooting from the hip has given way, of course, to shooting from the lip, but no matter; the effect is the same. In imagination and on social media, the Mormons, Indians, Mexicans, liberal-thinking left-wingers and the Chinese have been vanquished; humiliated, put to flight with their tails between their legs, the taunts of the messianic Lassiter ringing in their ears.

Supporting this return to a Wild West sentimentality, of course, are the workings of nostalgia, which often repaints the past through rose-coloured glasses. Tales like Riders of the Purple Sage are written as stories of heroism. Just as denominational Christianity can’t abide any suggestion of cracks in the armour of the Jesus Christ as they’ve each constructed him, so a Lassiter either has no faults, or more accurately, is followed by disciples unable to admit of any cracks. That’s the problem with heroes without character; with time, cracks enlarge to become gashes, gashes widen until disintegration is unavoidable. “There is a crack in everything; that’s how the light gets in,” Leonard Cohen famously sang to us. This too shall pass, once the light gets in.

The re-emerging longing for Wild West answers isn’t the only historic signpost to the present state of the Union. Slavery was wrested away from the south and a demographic of “good guys” formed, with the released slaves and “them damned Yankees” lumped together as the enemy. It would be naive to assume the biases of that era would not be passed down to the present; we see it now in the denigration of Confederate symbols on the Yankee side and their veneration on the other. No less significant were the brutally genocidal Indian Wars which, again, left an imprint on the soul and the mind of Americans and reinforced divisions. That the burden of memory regarding these three historical realities (the Wild West, emancipation of slaves, subjugation of Aboriginal populations) should linger in the unconscious of America to this very day is surprising only to those who don’t see how one generation sets the table for the next, that next generation for its successors, etc.

Progressives often attribute to ignorance, stupidity, simple-mindedness the pro-Trump movement’s dogged determination to support their Lassiter to the bitter end, regardless of what he does. The fact that the Trump camp has a similar opinion of the progressive half of America simply means that they’ve come to look at each other over a chasm across which the throwing of rocks and insults seems the only communication left to them. As in a spaghetti western, subtleties like social contracts, legalisms, manners, ethical principles become meaningless and the focus turns to a kind of gunfight in the OK Corral. The quick draw and the accurate, most deadly shot is all that matters when we get to this impasse.

There are reasons, of course, for the fact that the progressive-leaning population is a slow-draw, easily-gunned-down, easily caricatured cohort. Progressive politics and religion carry the burden of proposing novel ideas in answer to evolving issues; it’s easy to make sport with the unfamiliar. Conservative politics and religion rest on the past and most often on an assumption that, with effort, old solutions can be dragged into the present and the nostalgically-visualized past will return. In Riders of the Purple Sage, Chapter 1, Lassiter stymied the Mormons; today’s Lassiter will clean up the mess we find ourselves in. Who are seen as the Mormons, Indians, cattle thieves and Mexicans in today’s real-life novel? Take your pick of brown immigrants, Mexicans, a swamp of civil service ne’er-do-wells and the “socialist/communist hordes”—the task for Lassiter is almost too large to be accomplished without a huge cadre of sycophants kissing his holsters. The motto is not “Make America Great,” you will have noticed. It’s “Make America Great Again.” Let’s go forward by reversing, in other words.

What it boils down to in the end, is the arrival at a plausible, livable, new social contract. As defined in Britannica, a social contract is “an actual or hypothetical compact or agreement between the ruled and their rulers, defining the rights and duties of each.” In modern democracies, we would point to a constitution as an “actual” contract, the ethical codes held in common by the majority as “hypothetical” contracts. In a nation as large and diverse as the USA, there are bound to be groups and individuals who take exception to items in the “contract,” polygamy in The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints giving way to the ethic of monogamy in the national social contract, for instance. But every social contract is fluid; the monarchy in Great Britain has evolved through many bumps and reversals from a contract of absolute rule to representative democracy rule.

The USA today has hit upon a time when the social contract no longer works well, neither for citizens nor for governments. Pockets of population demand strict adherence to one item in the constitution (the gun lobby, for instance) while ignoring all countervailing items. The question of what in the office of president is lawful and what isn’t is under tense scrutiny. How the nation will reach “a renewed or hypothetical compact or agreement” is really what the current political turmoil is all about.

Oversimplified, there are at least these two ways of settling the contract renewal dilemma: 1) measured, patient negotiation in good faith or 2) the exercise of power such that the current rulers enforce a contract which matches their vision of what it ought to be. The Wild West image of making things happen looking down the barrel of a weapon has to be enticing because it’s fast, it answers the human need for conquest and it ends up with a contract—although lopsided—that favours the vision of the ones holding the guns. Compromise be damned.

Enter the Biden/Harris, Trump/Pence shootout at the OK Corral. I’m sure that by now the citizenry of the USA is gaining an awareness that no matter who wins the shootout, the social contract will remain in tatters. A nation that can’t find an agreed-to process to mend the contract will inevitably break apart and states, for instance, will promulgate a constitution with which they can live and break away from a nation and other states with whom they no longer feel at home. California comes to mind. An unlikely alternative to this is the separation referendum, of course, where the residents in the state weigh the pros and cons of separation and the result forms a component of the contract going forward. Referenda in Quebec, in Scotland and Brexit itself clarified the populations wish regarding creating a new contract or holding their noses and living with the old. That can only work if the prevailing social contract includes the sovereignty of a majority vote.

The election of the current president in 2016 signaled the emergence of a renewed Wild West mentality. The building of the wall, the getting tough with China, the tearing up of trade deals, the insulting of democratic presidents and prime ministers along with the praise for dictators were early signals that tiresome negotiation would not be America’s immediate future. Say what we want—and many a pundit has—that despite the president’s colossal ignorance on any details beyond the obvious in foreign affairs, domestic affairs and, well, pretty much everything, the fact remains that he is the most powerful force in whatever happens to the quest for a renewed social contract, and that he has so managed to dominate the news that his following numbers in the tens of millions. He is their Lassiter.

I haven’t finished reading Riders of the Purple Sage and I’m not sure I will. Grey has written some remarkable passages describing the countryside, the ambiance of sage brush country. His characterization of anything that is deeply human borders on the absurd, though, not totally unlike Trump’s characterizations of anyone who doesn’t support him, mimicking the uncontrolled movements of a citizen with cerebral palsy, for instance. The Wild West approach requires that empathy be dampened down, and if you never had any, well, bonus.

And here’s another kicker. Peace is boring. Negotiating, conversation, dialogue are boring. Patience is boring. Nothing beats either the gunfight or the tongue fight to raise one’s heart rate, to excite the mind and to offer at the end the reward of conquest. (Except, possibly, the Roughriders kicking the s**t out of the Stampeders!) If humanity is to evolve, finally, in the direction of Kingdom of peace and justice, triumphalist power and its application will always be that which seeks to undo every forward step. All the way up to and including the soldier shot through the throat and dying in the mud of a battlefield, it seems so many of us believe that old lie, Dulce et decorum est, pro patria mori. It is sweet and honourable (some translate it proper) to die for one’s country.

One of the greatest “Mennonite” sermons was written as a poem during WWI when Wilfred Owen (who likely never darkened an Anabaptist church door) penned Dulce et decorum est. Owen was discharged to hospital with severe PTSD in 1917 and died at 25 in 1918, just one more victim of the great lie about which he wrote. I’d urge re-reading it at: https://www.poetryfoundation.org/poems/46560/dulce-et-decorum-est

Happy Trails to You!

i  I confess that I don’t know much about relations among Mormon settlers and non-Mormons in Utah at the time in which Riders of the Purple Sage is set. Certainly their characterization in the novel is startling when we compare it to what is today The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints.

Friday, July 17, 2020

You're free to say anything, anywhere . . ..


(Preamble: As is usual, my posts reflect an opinion, hopefully with credible support. I relish debate, discussion on anything I write about so don’t hesitate to pose another viewpoint either by commenting on the post or emailing me at gg.epp41@gmail.com.)

On Mackinac Bridge, January, 2016

Let’s begin with the obvious: physically, anyone can say anything he/she wants, wherever and whenever the mood and incentive present. Senate page, Brigette Marcelle, can whip out a “Stop Harper” placard during the throne speech and parade it in front of the then-prime minister. We are free to stand in front of the Post Office locally and assail patrons with a religious or political message. If we have the nerve, no one will stop us from standing up in church and denouncing the pastor mid-sermon.
    The issue so much in the news these days is not free speech, really, it’s the effects and consequences of speech, period. A letter in Harper’s Magazine over the signatures of 150 “names of note” posited that we’re too “illiberal” in the consequences we mete out for the expression of unpopular opinions. (Columnist/author Malcolm Gladwell signed, but tweeted that he signed it because he disagreed with the views of some other signatories and wasn’t his right to do so exactly what the letter was about?) 
    Many a professor or teacher has lost his/her job for promulgating unpopular opinions—like the Holocaust never happening, or that aids is a homosexual disease—and I daresay that to teach that socialism is the economy of the future would in most any American university right now signal time to update one’s resume. That’s not an equivalent case to a brother-in-law praising Trump at a family gathering. Call it free speech or whatever, there are substantial gradations in the offense speech delivers and the consequences that apply . . . that should or shouldn’t apply.
    If I hold an unpopular opinion, the expression of it in my community comes down to a personal judgment, including the weighing of consequences. I think we all assume that the world would be better if others would see sense and adopt our opinions, whether we’re with the majority or the minority. Holding a minority opinion will always be the weaker position, and so consequences for expressing a given opinion (especially on matters of far-reaching consequences) will always seem harsh simply because dissenters will be louder, more numerous, often by far. And so, the cry for having the right to express minority opinions generally comes off as the complaints of “victims,” which fact doesn’t consider that the right to express an opinion and to express opposition to that opinion are equal rights or are no rights at all.
    Given the right circumstances, most of us can be deluded into thinking that “sticks and stones may break [one’s] bones, but words can never hurt [one].” Indeed, the assault rifle probably pales in its ability to do harm when compared to the tongue. “The pen is mightier than the sword,” primarily because it can lead to war or avert it while the sword can only deal with the consequences of diplomatic failure.
    Our words support discrimination or they alleviate it; our words can encourage hope, or promote despair; our words build people up or tear them down; and if current social media are the yardsticks, can bring out the loving best in us or encourage the hate-filled worst.
    A recent social media post claimed that the Holocaust had nothing to do with racism, but rather that the NAZIs assumed Jews would leak government plans to the enemy and the concentration camps were set up to prevent that. Are the people promulgating this opinion to be protected from criticism on the basis of their right to “free speech?” Or if a person expressing such opinions is invited to address university students on the Holocaust, should “free speech” protect that person from protests by students? Certainly not, and not anymore than would constitutional protection for exercising “the right to set fire to things.”
    If speech ceases to merit consequences, then ignorance and erudition become equals. Harm or benefit should set the benchmarks for the acceptability of public utterance. Our nation, our provinces, our municipalities, our communities are given stability by what we often call “a social contract.” Speech—just like actions—shouldn’t be allowed to diminish the value a stable social contract renders to us as individuals. The attack on democracy we see happening south of the border can certainly be blamed—in part, at least—on a carelessness with truth modeled in the declarations and tweets of the president, granting license for all kinds of divisive rhetoric in the fringes of the nation by his example. 
    To declare that white supremacist or racial slurs are guarded by the constitutional right to free speech is a non sequitur. Diminishing a person’s self-confidence, tarnishing a reputation by whatever means, lessening a group’s chances of achieving equality in the nation, these are crimes and speech is often the weapon of choice.

    Perhaps something needs to be said as well about that kind of positively-approached jousting of opinions by which communities work their way to a decision during times of controversy, particularly.
    We may underestimate the significance of our elections, for instance, which are peaceful, and the results of which are accepted without rancour or rebellion. We do have courteous (for the most part) habits to inform us.

Something is wrong in a family or community if certain subjects become taboo, or if legitimate but differing opinions are stifled in the public forum. Granted, to have the self-confidence to state and defend a minority opinion, even where there is an existing commitment to unity, can be wrenching; the first order of business must always be the determination to extend a fair hearing to every individual. Communities have too often so neglected the arts of dialogue that minority views feel too threatened to give voice to their stances. If it applies anywhere, then surely this is a place and situation where “free speech” should make sense.
    Nevertheless, where pronouncements tend to undermine the social or community contract, the penalties ought to be commensurate with the potential damage in order to be just. A teacher indoctrinating vulnerable students with a revisionist history hasn’t—probably—broken any bones, but is the damage less than would be the actual breaking of an arm or leg? Is it OK to wave an “All Lives Matter” placard at “Black Lives Matter” demonstrators? If discrimination against black persons is a problem, and if the demonstration is an effort to persuade the public to accept changes that would alleviate the problem, then efforts to water down the movement’s message with such speech—even though reasonable generally—may be no less criminal than driving a car into the demonstration. This is not free speech; this is psychological, political arson.
    By now, there is far too much hurtful, harmful speech being propagated to allow us even the dream of a just and honourable social contract, at least in the internet forums. I’ve tried to engage in a number of conversations online that fall into the “COVID 19 as political hoax,” category as courteously as I’m able, hoping in my small way to—I guess—impose my “Canadian Christian Social Democratic Vision” on the hard-line, me-first-and-only dialogue. What I realized early on is that opinions on both sides are driven less by truth-seeking than by partisan loyalty. (Except in my case, of course!)

What we’ve agreed to in Western democracies is that majority opinions prevail, and that they’re expressed meaningfully through the ballot box and their legitimacy is honoured. It’s the heart of representative democracy.
    Perhaps, strengthening the significance of that combined with better liberal arts education is where our hopes for the future will lie.

Tuesday, June 23, 2020

Does your left wing know what your right wing is doing, or are you not a bird? An airplane?



By now I think most of us are pretty tired of the terms lefties and righties—or versions thereof—being hurled about as pejoratives. The terms don’t define anything that actually exists and even if a given person tends to side with liberal views and policies while a neighbour tends more toward conservative values, that doesn’t justify the labeling that’s becoming so strident in the West, for instance.

Right-wing worldview has come to mean something like a preference for keeping things as they are because they’re working. Its focus is individualistic; it favours self-reliance over social benefit, strict property rights, and as a result, isn’t keen on income equality, preferential hiring for minorities, feminism and/or any program that hands tax money over to the needy who should “just get over it, get a job, get off their asses.”

Left-wing worldview sees a role for government in ensuring the well-being of all citizens and
tend to be sympathetic toward universal health care, subsidized housing & daycare, social welfare and food banks. In North America, this doesn’t equate to socialism, particularly the kind we see in Venezuela, the former Soviet Union, China or North Korea. The fringes I’ll mention later tend to attach words like communist, or fascist to augment their vacuous pronouncements.

According to Jordan Peterson and others, the “leftie” viewpoint and the “rightie” worldview are necessary as checks against a politic that can swing too far toward the total nanny state on the one hand or a dictatorship/police state on the other. It’s when people with differing viewpoints lose the ability to dialogue productively and see each other as teams that must be defeated that the balancing breaks down and reasonable policy becomes difficult to negotiate.

We have plenty of examples to guide us in assessing where we are in keeping Canada in balance. The Russian Revolution swung so heavily toward the nanny state side that it destroyed itself and millions of its citizens with the excesses that followed. Latin American countries (Nicaragua, Columbia, Venezuela, for instance) have swung so sharply from one extreme to the other that citizens have been left to duck and run or die, time and again. Their balance systems have been known to fail . . . to put it graciously.

And let’s face it: in Canada today we’ve chosen a mixed economy and multi-culturalism, both of which are negotiated and balanced stances between extremes. What this means is that we have left wing and right wing-style commerce going on side by side, smoothly and productively. Most Canadians are conservative on preserving/ “conserving” the environment, liberal (actually, socialist) on healthcare. Phone, gas and hydro service in Saskatchewan are state-owned, potash mines are free enterprise. These few examples illustrate the frustrating and unnecessary dividing into hostile camps (NDP voters are lefties, CPU voters and Saskatchewan Party voters are righties.) What exactly is this labeling supposed to achieve? Except, if one of our great desires is for peace, another thing we are itching to have is a fight (this irony I witness in myself, time and again). And for fighting, name-calling, ridiculing you need sides. And these sides need derogatory names that can fit on a placard.

One might think that a test of our “balance” could be had from the way we have dealt with, for instance, gun ownership, or Medical Assistance in Dying, or gay marriage, or drug regulation. Typically, we have felt our way over time toward a position with which the majority can live. Liberals start a gun registry, Conservatives abolish it. Liberals ban classes of weapons, Conservatives cry foul. It’s a nation of social-leaners, capitalist-leaners and a mass of voters indifferent on the subject clumsily negotiating their way to a compromise. Liberalism may bring in assisted dying legislation; Conservatives are there to ensure that it doesn’t escalate to extremes. And vise versa, of course.

For reasons wise people could probably explain to me, our politics hasn’t capitalized on cooperative legislating and decision making. Take right now in this minority parliament during a pandemic when collaboration ought to be so very obvious an approach. What we have instead is decisions made for us in cabinet, opposition parties scrambling to find messages that denigrate the Liberal’s plans and processes when it would make good sense to govern in a “committee of the whole” manner, with all the ideas and all the “safeguarding” voices in one room.

Here’s a thought. What would change if in that debating phase of governance we call parliament, legislators would draw lots for seating in the chamber? It strikes me that at present—with government and opposition members ranged like battalions across a no-man’s land as if in preparation for medieval battling—the very configuration militates against productive dialogue and the necessary give and take when important matters are being negotiated. You’re much less likely to jeer an opposition member if he/she is sitting right beside you and you’ve been chatting about your respective grandchildren while waiting for question period to start.

The upshot of “us vs. them” politics is written all over the news coming from the USA. Divisive leftie/rightie rhetoric seeded into the general population will, I think, always produce hardened fringes that don’t even need to know what the issues are, that bond with others to form an antagonistic “club” identifiable as the extreme version of whatever ideology gave them birth. A problem is that democracies know intuitively that the extremes aren’t what they want, but the Skin Heads, the Antifas, white supremacists, the Tea Party, the gun lobbies, etc., tend to suck up all the oxygen available to journalism, dominating our news and encouraging us to think that we’re headed toward one or the other hell.

Some would say that “it’s just human nature,” or that “this is as good as it gets,” neither of which give us much hope for a future in which we’re eager to participate.

Being Canadian, I’m obviously most concerned with how we as a nation will launch ourselves into the future, particularly now in the light of the pandemic, the decimated economy, the changes happening in our southern neigbour and climate change. Perhaps this column falls into the category of the old man who plants trees, knowing he’ll never live to enjoy their shade, although the temptation is to hunker down and make the best of the good things this country has allowed me . . . and to hell with politics. But I’m also a history buff and through much reading have discovered how extensively one generation sets the table for the next generation . . . and the next . . ..

We must not let the line between imagined camps grow darker and wider as is the tactic of an incompetent US president. How to erase this barrier is the challenge before us. To this end, I have two suggestions: 1) do away with the party system in provincial politics and run our provincial government the way municipalities are run. (Side note: Toronto has 2.5 times the population of all Saskatchewan), and 2) have members of parliament choose their seat in the chamber by lot, not by party.

Would that be a start? I think so. If you’d like to dialogue with me on this or any other topic, my email address is gg.epp41@gmail.com.


Monday, June 15, 2020

To reconcile what has become divided




Seems to me we need to do some serious thinking on the topic of racism, beginning with recognizing that it exists on two levels: the personal and the corporate.

A story: The Nepalese Gurkhas gained renown as mercenary fighting units for mainly the British in India. After Indian Independence in 1947, they were given the choice of serving in the Indian or British Army. A minority chose the Indian army and served on the Indian sub-continent, but were always looked down on (personal racism) as the dirty Nepalese and were paid poorly compared to Indian soldiers. When Gurkha soldiers retired from soldiering, they received no support from India, were disallowed from owning property (corporate racism) and were basically persona non grata in their neighbourhoods.

Not identical to--but showing similarities to the situation of the descendants of slaves in the Americas and Indigenous populations in the USA, Canada and elsewhere--Kiran Desai’s The Inheritance of Loss has a wonderful description of what can go on in the consciousness of a member of a visible minority when events like the killing of George Floyd happen. This is about Gyan, an underemployed, underpaid Nepalese inhabitant of India as he joins with an insurgent movement:

"For a moment all the different pretenses he had indulged in, the shames he had suffered, the future that wouldn’t accept him—all these things joined together to form a single truth.

"The men sat [in the canteen] unbedding their rage, learning, as everyone does in this country, at one time or another, that old hatreds are endlessly retrievable.

"And when they had disinterred it, they found the hate pure, purer than it could ever have been before, because the grief of the past was gone. Just the fury remained, distilled, liberating. It was theirs by birthright, it could take them so high, it was a drug. They sat feeling elevated, there on the narrow wood benches, stamping their cold feet on the earth floor."

Like Paul to Timothy, we are urged to “Study to show thyself approved unto God, a workman that needs not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth.” What do we need to learn here? 

Obviously, looking at a visible minority member from the outside will differ from his/her view from the inside. Can we get a faithful perspective without hearing from the police, the indigenous people and people of colour? Not easy in a time of pandemic.

To declare that we are not individually racist (personal) may not be enough, may not even be important, but where corporate racism continues to exist, we can be sure that personal discrimination and racism may well follow. And from places like India, Columbia, USA, Canada, Nicaragua, Russia, France, Germany, Great Britain, China/Hong Kong, etc., we should have learned by now that where corporate discrimination persists, violence often follows.

These are surely times for churches to give at least some of their energy to the breaking down of corporate and personal prejudice and racism. What might that mean in your church, in mine? We dare not declare ourselves in solidarity with a side, neither that of the protesters nor the justice establishment; our calling is to make peace, to do our bit to reconcile what has become divided, to offer ideas for change that might accomplish at least some of what would make for a better world. 

Our solidarity is with all who share the planet.

Perhaps that’s what we need to “study.” Eh?
gg.epp41@gmail.com for comments. 


Saturday, June 06, 2020

Defund the Police? What?

HI!

“Defund the Police,” strikes me as yet another slogan to accompany “Black Lives Matter,” “I Can’t Breathe,” and so on. A new thing to fit on a waving placard and for me, a good reason to pause and think again about the role and practice of law enforcement as we find it today.

Take our experience of the mass killing in Nova Scotia recently, the skepticism about police actions in that event, questions about whether or not it could have been prevented and the subsequent attempts by the RCMP to justify its actions. And given the way we currently deal with violence and crime, and given that the perpetrator always has a huge advantage over enforcement, the reasons and excuses for the tardy apprehension of the perpetrator may well be valid.

And I think about the role of policing in the demonstrations/riots currently going on full bore in the USA, triggered by the police murder of George Floyd and the ongoing attempts by police to find their way out of charges of endemic racist practices in their ranks. We’re familiar with the scenes of battalions of robot-like, Darth Vader-like riot police in full conflict gear descending on demonstrators as if this were a face-off between two teams, one angry and unarmed, the other equipped like a military force with lethal weapons. From the president, meanwhile, a tunnel-vision preoccupation with brute force as the solution to every conflict.

I think it’s reasonable to say that our policing is primarily engaged in apprehending and punishing breakers of the law. There is a preventative aspect to that, of course: you can’t rob a bank from a jail cell. But on the whole, we’re putting a great deal more tax money into cleaning up after deviance than we are spending on preventing it in the first place. Perhaps this is what “Defund the Police” is all about; reducing the budget to policing and diverting it instead to social services, schools and wholesome recreation for youth. Poverty, discrimination, racism and the ennui of “nothing to do” are all like petri dishes for the culture of anger and deviance. Why not reinvest scarce dollars into preventative facilities?

I’m not well versed in the training of the police, I admit. What I’ve gleaned, though, is that a similarity to military training can’t be ignored. I’ve seen prospective Mounties marching in crisp uniforms and in strict formation in Regina. There’s weapons training, self defense practice and, of course, enough law and human rights indoctrination to prevent abuse. In part, it’s reasonable. It strikes me that police being summoned, for instance, to a weapons incident would be deathly afraid for their own lives given the history of so many of their fellows dying in service. But as surely as the parameters of medical practice, for instance, are bound and governed by the social contract we’ve agreed to as citizens, so our policing has always responded to what the public demands.

Perhaps citizens are beginning to change their minds on what policing shall look like in the future, their clues coming from the news of the Nova Scotia massacre, the “lynching” of George Floyd and myriad stories of guns, gangs, shoot-outs and mayhem in the streets of our towns and cities. Too often, police involvement has made conflicts worse, even when officers and constables are decent, compassionate people. Fear for our lives changes how we react to the world around us.

So often, families of people who’ve died while being “policed” have cried out for justice. Unfortunately the justice they are calling for isn’t justice at all, it’s retribution akin to “an eye for and eye and a tooth for a tooth.” The justice that the Old Testament prophets, that Jesus Christ cried out for is something else: it’s in righteous and compassionate dealings in all aspects of society, evenly and mercifully distributed to every child of creation so that all can rest in the good will of their neighbours.

The adult in us is shaped by the experiences of our childhood and adolescence. Perhaps it makes a lot of sense to put our dollars into a better school for every child; more and better-trained teachers; a universal guaranteed income plan; engaging recreation, music and arts opportunities everywhere children are growing up; fabulous, universal daycare.

And finally, determining together to pursue a real and forward-looking plan to eliminate every injustice that ends up necessitating retributive policing. A country without guns, because, “Why the hell would I need one, stupid?”

And, putting our money where our mouths are, eh?

Thursday, May 28, 2020

COVID 19: The possible and the probable.

Spire of Metropolitan Cathedral, Casco Viejo, Panama City

"Though a good deal is too strange to be believed, nothing is too strange to have happened." ~ Thomas Hardy in Notebook, 1871.

Somewhere around 1982, we decided to spend Christmas in Victoria B.C. And because we’d be away for a few weeks, we asked a daughter of friends to nip into our apartment in Thompson, Manitoba a few times to water our houseplants. In Victoria, we became bored and decided to take the ferry to Vancouver for a few days. We stopped in at a mall—quite at random—and at lunch time, wandered up to a cafeteria on the second floor where a queue had formed. Before us was a young couple and at some point the girl turned around, and it was the girl we’d commissioned to look after our plants back in Thompson, some 2,000 Km away!

Thomas Hardy was right; there’s nothing so bizarre or unbelievable that it could never happen. In fact, given the infinity of space, the enormity of the numbers of galaxies, stars and planets, the eternity of time, the likelihood of even the strangest, most unbelievable event not happening somewhere even now would be the oddity. That is, unless in all this universe the accident of planet earth being the only one among gazillions to have the right conditions for life turns out to be a fact. But how likely is that?

An old adage says that if you put enough monkeys in a room with enough typewriters, they will eventually write the Bible, simply by their random pecking at keys. The use of enough makes this a tautology; if no Bible has been written, it’s because they haven’t been given enough time. Is this literally true? Or is it just a way of illustrating 1) the randomness of the universe, and/or 2) the lack of constraints on what shape probability will take. If you roll a die 1000 times you’d likely bet that the number of times each number turns up would be about the same. But if you roll one die 6 times, it’s not only possible but not unusual to have the 6-side come up all 6 times.

It will happen eventually, only because it’s possible.

The odds against winning a lottery are, they say, slimmer than the odds of being struck by lightening. Yet someone always wins. And even the man who goes out in a thunderstorm thinking the odds favour his safe return will eventually be struck by lightning if he persists in this behaviour. Or not. It’s not probable but it is possible that he’ll never be struck by lightning but that his neighbour who stays indoors during storms is victimized by lightning . . . multiple times!

Bizarre and unexpected as they may be, things don’t happen or not happen because of probability; they happen because of possibility. The events we consider bizarre, even miraculous by the odds, happen all the time. When they do, it’s easy for us to postulate a guiding hand . . . how else could something so unlikely happen?

When we do something—or avoid doing something—on the strength of probability or improbability, we’re gambling; we do it all the time. We get into a car and drive to the city because we know that statistically, for every 10,000 or so cars making that trip, very few end up in a crash. But my car crashing on this trip is possible and friends hearing of my misfortune—should it happen—would be shocked, but probably not surprised.

Everything we need to know about cause and effect, probability and possibility, degrees of risk can, of course, be learned by paying attention in Math class, or by thinking deeply about the COVID 19 pandemic and people’s and governments’ reactions to it. To this point, it’s become clear that the possibility of becoming infected exists world-wide. The probability varies according to a number of factors including the ability/non-ability to survive in relative isolation. So far, the most common approach has been to lower the probability by reducing human contact and possible transmission of the virus. Cases documented have shown that even when probability is muscled down to near zero, the possibility can’t be ignored; a man related that his bout of COVID 19 infection could only be traced—as far as he could tell—to the touching of a doorknob. It was possible. It happened.

As we attempt to normalize our world again, we’re called upon as individuals to assess our risk of becoming vectors for the virus. Every unguarded human-to-human contact contains the possibility of setting off a geometrically-spreading chain of infection. Indeed, that’s the only modus operandi of the COVID 19 spread as far as we know. People will undoubtedly respond differently. Some will see the loosening of guidelines for gatherings as a signal that the storm has passed and its business as usual again. Some will continue to isolate until they’re satisfied that the probability of infection is so low that caution no longer makes sense. The majority, I think, will vacillate, alternating between mask wearing and not wearing, for instance, thereby opening the possibility and the probability doors wider than necessary.

Apparently we assess risk differently; as I write this, New Brunswick—a province that was on the verge of being COVID 19 free—went back into social distancing mode because a doctor had traveled to Quebec, returned and continued treating patients, bringing upwards of 100 people into contact with the virus he’d picked up in Quebec. Not only did he break cross-border, isolation-after-travel protocols, but he suspended his professional judgment and banked on the low probability of catching COVID 19 . . . and ended up playing Russian roulette with the health of many.

To make a province and finally the country free of COVID 19, we must make our decisions on the basis of what’s possible, not what’s probable. If necessary, those too uninformed or too defiant to stay with the prevention program may well have to be subjected to severe penalties. Come to think of it, the New Brunswick doctor might well be subject to a charge of criminal negligence and/or criminal negligence causing death depending on the consequences of his error. But what about the person breaking protocols without any harm done? Would that be like getting a ticket for speeding in a school zone even if you didn’t hit a child?

The risks with COVID 19 are not like the risk one takes when setting out in a boat on a stormy day. With the virus, any risk I take imposes a risk on anyone with whom I have contact. That alone must give me pause before I leave my mask at home and say, “Jeez, it’ll never happen.”

“Nothing is too strange to have happened,” Hardy wrote.

"When there's a professional in the house, don't go to your horse for advice."


Thursday, November 21, 2019

Parallelograms and Taxes

Spring - Nadine Ens
“I’m glad I studied parallelograms in high school rather than how to do my taxes; it’s really handy at parallelogram time!”

Aphorisms like the one above have been floating around in increasing numbers on social media. There are a couple of problems with declarations of, “Why waste my time in school studying things I don’t use when I’m out there making a life, a family, a career?” One is obvious: there is no reason why a person of average intelligence (as most of us are) can’t become proficient at both taxes and parallelograms. Secondly, taxes are a complex issue and learning how to fill out the income tax declaration so it’s acceptable to Revenue Canada doesn’t guarantee an understanding of how our governments collect and spend citizens’ dollars, doesn’t guarantee that we will be knowledgeable about the huge picture of how citizens cooperate to run a nation successfully. Doesn’t guarantee that we’ll be voters any democracy would be proud of.

Meanwhile, parallelograms are just a small, almost insignificant part of Mathematics and Geometry, and Mathematics and Geometry can provide basic understandings of how the universe works, understandings that were necessary for the invention of everything from the wheel to the silicon chip. True, people who do understand wheels and silicon chips will make a computer for me that I can use, but our future as a civilization depends on how our knowledge and inventiveness is applied. We learned to harness nuclear energy . . . and made with that knowledge a bomb that can kill thousands in a single event. Our children and grandchildren’s happiness depends on our understanding of the predictable consequences of climate change and a host of other issues.

Anatomically, learning is the creation of brain pathways that facilitate thinking and/or that facilitate physical action, like playing a chord on a guitar or mixing different paints to achieve a certain colour, or filling out a tax form while contemplating the meaning of Schroedinger’s cat experiment. The number of pathways that can be created is unlimited; studying parallelograms doesn’t interfere with learning how to fill out a tax form. Children who live in a two-language environment can become fluent in both before they even start school.

For me, a good analogy for understanding learning is music. We appear to be born with a pathway that recognizes rhythm, certainly, and harmony, possibly. But to play the piano, numerous additional pathways must be created, and the pathway that allows the brain and body to cooperate in identifying C# on paper and playing it on the keyboard, I’m told, requires an average of seventy repetitions before it becomes a permanent pathway. You can easily imagine how many brain pathways are required, for instance, to play Rachmaninoff’s Piano Concerto No. 3 in D Minor, Opus 30. You might think that to play this, Alexander Malofeev could have done nothing but practice every day, all day. True, he practiced a lot, spent a lot of time with teachers. But learning his level of skill on the piano certainly didn’t prevent him from learning to fill out a tax form, to appreciate the applications of the parallelogram in mechanical applications.

The brain, we’ve learned, has amazing capacities so that if its potential were to be measured in gigabytes, it would exceed the largest computer we’ve invented. I can’t imagine that anyone claiming that learning only a few pathways necessary for mundane survival is doing it justice. For believers, the argument might go like this: “Why would God have given us such capability except as a gift to be used, to be enjoyed, to be inventive, to be happy.”

Renaissance Man is a humanist doctrine that says, according to Britannica: “[man is] limitless in his capacities for development . . . and . . . should try to embrace all knowledge and develop [his] own capacity as fully as possible.” Leonardo da Vinci, painter, inventor, mathematician, humanist is held up as the hallmark of the Renaissance spirit, of course.

It’s too easy to point at schools’ failure to educate our children in all the pathways that the complex life to come will require of them. We are all implicated. The broadening of our capacity—as Britannica puts it—is a life-long, exciting endeavour. Adults who model curiosity and exploration to children need not be in the education business. To expect teachers to make up for parents who themselves dropped out of the learning, exploring, practicing mentality is to ask too much of them.

So what causes us to mount this attack on broad, liberal education? Is it our belief that to secure a good occupation with good pay is all that’s necessary for our sense of worth, our happiness? Is it sheer laziness that creates in us a dominant brain pathway that responds primarily to entertainment and physical pleasure? Or is it that we live in a culture and economy that benefits from an ignorant-and-so-gullible population?

I asked a person aged around 20 a while ago what would be the best way for a museum curator to communicate with her generation. “Not facebook or posters or announcements in newspapers,” was her answer: “Instagram, Snap-chat; a striking picture with not more than one sentence.” Her opinion, apparently, was that the days of “reading stuff” was over, that attention would now be paid primarily to rapid-fire, ever-changing visual stimuli. It’s scary. Think about it. The wisdom of the ages stored in books sent to recycling in favour of the mental masturbation of flashing stimuli on a screen.

That sounds harsh, but far more important even than the spouting of badly framed, almost incoherent opinions on climate change, for instance, is the language competence with which we debate and come to agreement on important issues that affect us all. Young people are graduating from our institutions without the ability to frame a coherent, logical argument, spoken or in writing. Challenging enough for many is the constructing of an intelligible sentence. There are so many essential brain pathways that aren’t developing because, in part at least, smart phones and computers have duped us into thinking that reading and writing, thinking and debating are as redundant as the knowledge of parallelograms.

Akin to the aphorism with which I began this diatribe is a current meme that says, in effect, “My ignorance is worth just as much as your knowledge,” a viewpoint supported by the fact that the one who knows lots and the one who knows nothing each get one vote. In the end, democracy lives or dies by the wisdom of the individuals who cast ballots.

So, what am I really urging here? Nothing more than that we be life-long learners, and that we share a curiosity and an attitude of exploration with our children. When in his seventies, my father-in-law expressed a thought that he would go back to university—if only he was younger. “I’d be eighty when I graduated!” My wife’s comment to him was, “Well, how old will you be in four years if you don’t go?”

Some suggestions:
  1. Think about brain-health as much as about physical health. Read this article on Alzheimer’s prevention.
  2. Study and learn another language; use the free DuoLingo or the cheap Babel or take a class.
  3. Get back to reading books, even if it’s slow going and you sometimes need a dictionary at your elbow. Take notes as you go.
  4. Walk 6,000 steps a day if you can.
  5. Take a course on a subject on which you’ve never concentrated before. Athabasca University is only one source you might peruse.
  6. Volunteer in your local school; take note of how education is done “these days.”
  7. Correspond with a friend as a way of exploring issues, by email can work.
  8. Cut down TV time to make room for reading and study.
  9. Eat more fish.
  10. Learn a word a day . . . and use it seventy times.
  11. Join or form a book club.
  12. Get a library card and go there often.
  13. Actually read political party platforms.
  14. Buy a ukelele or a recorder and learn to play it.
  15. Visits museums and galleries and engage with what’s on display.
  16. Learn the difference among parallelograms, trapezoids, rhombuses, isosceles and equilateral triangles . . . just for fun!
  17. Above all, challenge yourself! Think “I should try to embrace all knowledge and develop my own capacity as fully as possible.”